Beginning March 1, 2013, a party seeking an extension of time to file an intial, answer, or reply brief and who has obtained the agreement of opposing counsel may file a “notice of extension of time” in lieu of a motion requesting an extension. Such a notice will be accepted for up to 90 days for an intial or answer brief and 60 days for a reply brief. Only the party seeking the extension need sign the notice, and no order will issue upon the Court’s receipt. Any extension beyond 90 days for initial or answer briefs or 60 days for reply briefs must be by motion. For additional details, including the approved form of the notice, see the Court’s administrative order at http://5dca.org/Clerk/Administrative%20Orders/AO5D13-02_RE_Agree_Ext_of_Time_for_Filing_Briefs.pdf
© Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, PA, 2013. All rights reserved.Fifth District Changes Procedure for Obtaining Extension of Time to File
Boost: AJAX core statistics
- Primary menu
- Home
- Publish With Us
- Contributors
- About Us
- Contact Us
- Advertise
- Sign Up For NLR Bulletins
- QUICK LINKS
- Antitrust Law
- |
- Bankruptcy & Restructuring
- |
- Biotech & Cleantech
- |
- Business of Law
- |
- Election
- Construction & Real Estate
- |
- Environmental, Energy & Resources
- |
- Financial, Securities & Banking
- Health Care
- |
- Immigration
- |
- IP Law
- |
- Insurance
- |
- Labor & Employment
- |
- Litigation
- |
- Media & FCC
- |
- Tax
Related Articles
- Early Termination of Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Proceeding Shows Versatility of PTAB Patent Trials
- En Banc Federal Circuit Issues Five Opinions in CLS Bank International v. Alice Corporation
- California Court Holds That the McCarran Ferguson Act Does Not "Reverse Preempt" Plaintiff's Rico Claims Against Insurer
- Supreme Court To Decide If It Will Decide Whether Securities Exchange Act Section 16 Plaintiff Has Constitutional Standing
- Unpaid Internships – Training Programs or a Lesson in Class Actions?
- Womble Carlyle Attorneys Obtain Reversal of Judgment in Breach of Contract Claim
- Federal Circuit Holds That Expert Evidence Is Not Required to Show Prior Art Reference Is Not Enabled
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Posting Rule Held Invalid by D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
From This Author
Advertisement
Advertisement
Recent Contributions to the National Law Review
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie and Kirkland, PLLC
Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.






