February 8, 2012

Final Regulations Issued on ESOP Diversification Rules

The Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") recently issued final regulations governing the diversification requirements for certain ESOPs. As discussed in our February 15, 2008 blog article, the IRS issued proposed regulations under section 401(a)(35) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") in January 2008. The final regulations largely incorporate the proposed regulations with a few changes and clarifications.
 

Background

Section 401(a)(35) of the Code was added by the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Prior to its enactment, ESOPs were required to allow participants who were at least 55 years of age and had completed at least 10 years of participation in the ESOP to diversify the investment of a portion of their accounts in assets other than employer securities. Section 401(a)(35) of the Code establishes additional diversification requirements for ESOPs that hold publicly-traded employer securities. The new provisions require that all participants be allowed to direct the portion of their accounts attributable to employee contributions and elective deferrals that are invested in the publicly-traded employer securities to other investment options. For the portion of employer contributions other than elective deferrals, the same diversification rights must be given to each participant with at least three years of service. The diversification requirements under Section 401(a)(35) of the Code are generally effective for plan years beginning after December 31, 2006.

Investment Funds

The proposed regulations provided that certain investment funds holding employer securities as part of a broader fund would not be treated as holding employer securities for purposes of the diversification requirements. This exception was limited to the extent the employer securities were held indirectly through an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940; a common or collective trust fund or pooled investment fund maintained by a bank or trust company supervised by a state or federal agency; or a pooled investment fund of a qualified insurance company. Additionally, the investment was required to be independent of the employer and the employer securities could not exceed 10% of the fund.

Commentators had requested that this exception be broadened in the final regulations to include funds that are managed by an investment manager (within the meaning of ERISA section 3(38)). The final regulations do not provide for this expansion under the rationale that such a fund would not necessarily be holding employer securities only as an indirect result of its investment policy. However, the final regulations changed the reference to a fund that is an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 to instead reference a regulated investment company as described under Section 851(a) of the Code. This change extends the type of investment companies that fall under the exception to include certain exchange traded funds.

Conclusion

It is important to note that the new diversification rules apply only to ESOPs that hold publicly-traded employer securities. Closely held companies continue to be subject to the diversification requirements applicable to participants who are at least 55 years old with at least 10 years of participation in the ESOP. Please see our February 20, 2007 blog article for a discussion of timing problems and solutions associated with the diversification rules that extend to companies who stock is not publicly traded. 
 

Copyright © 2012, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

The members of our ESOP Practice Group have been at the forefront of developments involving Employee Stock Ownership Plans for the past 20 years.  Our long history with ESOPs allows our lawyers to provide clients with advice that is based on the results of hundreds of ESOP transactions.   This experience, combined with our immersion in the most recent trends and developments, enables us to provide our clients with transaction structure designs and administration solutions that enable them to get the most benefit from their ESOPs and employee ownership of stock...

415-774-2927

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.