May 23, 2012

Final Say-On-Pay Rules Delay Requirements for Smaller Reporting Companies and TARP Participants

On January 25, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) released its final rules relating to shareholder approval of executive compensation arrangements.  These rules implement Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”).  While these new rules apply to all public companies, smaller reporting companies are exempt from compliance until 2013, and companies that received financial assistance under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) are exempt from compliance until the outstanding TARP funds are repaid.

Shareholder Approval of Executive Compensation and Golden Parachute Payments

Beginning in 2011 and subject to the exceptions described below, a public company must include in its proxy statement for its annual shareholders meeting a non-binding advisory proposal to approve the compensation of its named executive officers at least once every three years.  This non-binding advisory shareholder vote is commonly referred to as “say-on-pay.”  In addition, once every six years, a company must include a separate non-binding proposal in its proxy statement allowing its shareholders to vote on the frequency of the say-on-pay vote (i.e., whether the vote should occur every one, two or three years).  The say-on-pay vote is required for all public companies when proxies are solicited for an annual or other meeting of shareholders for which the disclosure of executive compensation is required.  Companies are not required to file a preliminary proxy statement in connection with the say-on-pay and frequency vote proposals.

 The rules also require that in any proxy materials for a meeting of shareholders to approve an acquisition or merger, the company must disclose any agreements or understandings it has with any named executive officers concerning any type of compensation to be paid to such executive officers that is based on the transaction.  These compensation arrangements are commonly referred to as “golden parachute” payments.  In addition to approving the acquisition or merger, the new rules require a separate advisory vote to approve any golden parachute payments.

Phase-in for Smaller Reporting Companies

Recognizing the potential burden these new rules may place on small public companies, the SEC adopted a temporary two-year phase-in for companies meeting the definition of a smaller reporting company.1  These companies will not be required to conduct either a say-on-pay vote or a frequency vote until the first annual or other meeting of shareholders occurring on or after January 21, 2013.2  This temporary delay does not, however, apply to the requirement to include a vote on golden parachute payments in connection with a merger, acquisition or other extraordinary transaction.

Delay for TARP Participants

Pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 and TARP, companies that received and have not repaid TARP funds are required to provide shareholders with an annual non-binding say-on-pay vote.  Accordingly, TARP participants are not required to conduct a separate say-on-pay vote under the SEC’s new rules, nor are they required to conduct a frequency vote so long as their TARP funds remain outstanding.3  The SEC’s new say-on-pay and frequency vote rules will apply to a TARP participant for its first annual meeting of shareholders after repayment of all outstanding TARP funds.

 ____________________

 1   Generally, a smaller reporting company is a company with a public float of less than $75 million, as determined annually in accordance with SEC rules.

2    With respect to proxy statements filed before the April 4, 2011 effectiveness of the phase-in rules, the SEC has advised that smaller reporting companies will not need to include the say-on-pay and frequency votes, which otherwise would have been required under the Dodd-Frank Act.

3    TARP prohibits golden parachute payments to senior executive officers during the period TARP assistance is outstanding.

© 2012 Vedder Price

About the Author

Associate

Christopher G. Barrett joined Vedder Price P.C. as an associate in the firm’s Capital Markets Group.  Mr. Barrett focuses on corporate and finance matters, concentrating primarily on public company representation and securities law matters.

     Mr. Barrett was the Executive Editor, Publications, for The Loyola University Chicago Law Journal.  Mr. Barrett is a member of the Chicago Bar Association.

312-609-7557

About the Author

Associate

William K. Hadler joined Vedder Price P.C. as an associate in the Capital Markets Group.  He concentrates his practice in the corporate finance and corporate transactional areas, with a focus on securities law matters.

312-609-7590

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.