Advertisement

April 16, 2014

Finally! HHS Office of Civil Rights Releases HIPAA Omnibus Rule With Sweeping Changes to Compliance Requirements and Enforcement

The final regulations1 from Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights (OCR) containing modifications to the HIPAA Privacy, Security, Enforcement, and Breach Notification Rules (Omnibus Rule) have finally been released, but the hard work of interpreting them has just begun for covered entities, business associates, and downstream entities of business associates, all of whom are significantly affected by the rule.

OCR Director Leon Rodriguez declared that the new provisions in the Omnibus Rule “not only greatly enhance a patient’s privacy rights and protections, but also strengthen the ability of [OCR] to vigorously enforce the HIPAA privacy and security protections.”2 The official press release announcing the Omnibus Rule confirms agency enforcement positions previously hinted at by HIPAA-related agency leaders, such as extending liability under HIPAA to business associates and subcontractors. But additionally, the press release gives the following preview to the other “sweeping changes” under the rule, including:

  • streamlined authorization requirements for the use of individuals’ health information for research purposes;
  • new limits on permissible uses of information for marketing and fundraising purposes; and
  • prohibitions on the sale of individuals’ health information without their permission.

Mintz Levin’s initial impressions of the Omnibus Rule include the following:

  • No Mercy for Business Associates:
    • As expected, business associates now have direct liability under HIPAA and must comply with all of its security and certain privacy standards. OCR did not provide business associates additional time to comply, despite requests for time submitted during the public comment period.
    • Business associate subcontractors (vendors of business associates) have identical compliance obligations, no matter how removed or how “downstream” their services are from a covered entity.
    • Existing business associate agreements must be updated for compliance with the revisions in the Omnibus Rule, but they can continue to operate under certain existing contracts until September 23, 2014 (one year after the date required for compliance with the Omnibus Rule).
  • Dramatic Changes to Marketing Activity Requirements: The Omnibus Rule now requires that prior to sending any marketing materials to an individual relating to a product or service paid for by a third party, the covered entity sending the communication must obtain individual authorization to receive such communications. OCR removed the distinctions between authorization requirements for communications relating to treatment versus those for health care operations included in its proposed rule.
  • Breach Analysis Changes: The Omnibus Rule requires a potential breaching party to perform a four-factor risk assessment to determine whether the breach must be reported, with the effect of significantly reducing a covered entity’s discretion regarding whether or not a breach must be disclosed to affected individuals, the government, and potentially the media.
  • Family Access to Decedents’ Personal Health Information (PHI): Family members of a decedent who were involved in the person’s care prior to his or her death may now access the decedent’s PHI.

Mintz Levin’s Health Law Practice is actively preparing a variety of educational materials and resources for covered entities, business associates, and downstream entities affected by the Omnibus Rule. The first of these materials will be a chart comparing the differences between the proposed and final rules to be published early next week.


1 HHS Office of Civil Rights, “Modifications to the HIPAA Privacy, Security, Enforcement, and Breach Notification Rules under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act; Other Modifications to the HIPAA Rules” (to be published Jan. 25, 2013), available at: http://www.ofr.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2013-01073_PI.pdf.

2 Dept. of Health and Human Services, “New rule protects patient privacy, secures health information,” News Release, (Jan. 17, 2013), available at: http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2013pres/01/20130117b.html.

©1994-2014 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Dianne J. Bourque, Health Care Attorney, Mintz Levin Law Firm
Of Counsel

Dianne advises a variety of health care clients on a broad range of issues, including licensure, regulatory, contractual, and risk management matters, and patient care. A large part of her practice involves counseling researchers and research sponsors in matters related to FDA and OHRP regulated clinical research, including patient consent, access to and use of tissue and associated patient information, and the Institutional Review Board process.

She also counsels health care clients and other business entities on the requirements of the HIPAA Privacy Rule and Security Standards,...

(617) 348-1614

About the Author

Stephanie Willis, Health Care, Attorney, Mintz Levin, Law Firm
Associate

Stephanie primarily works with health care clients, including clinical laboratories, renal dialysis providers, and hospitals to comply with state and federal laws and regulations governing licensure, reimbursement, health care fraud and abuse, telemedicine, and health information privacy requirements.

She has used her past experience as an Associate Counsel in the Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services and as an intern at various Massachusetts health care agencies to help clients achieve positive results.

202-434-7437

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or oth