May 23, 2012

Finding Optimism in the Private Equity and Venture Capital Markets

Much Shelist recently hosted a panel discussion titled "2010 Outlook: Private Equity and Venture Capital." After an unprecedented and troubling 2009, we were encouraged by the general sense of optimism shared by our panelists for 2010 and beyond. Leading indicators of deal activity in the private equity arena are up, and the number of venture capital deals grew significantly in the final quarter of 2009. Our panelists also pinpointed two important precursors to increased opportunity and deal activity in 2010: the amount of committed but uninvested capital and the ways in which many investors and portfolio companies have adapted during the economic downturn. In spite of these promising developments, concern still lingered about uncertain longer-term exit potential and the time required to return to a robust credit market.

A Difficult 2009 Gives Way to a More Optimistic Future

Not surprisingly, our panel agreed that 2009 was a difficult year, particularly for distressed companies that needed to sell and venture-backed companies that were raising a second or later round of funding. Companies unable to hold their financial ground found themselves in a buyer's market—facing lower multiples, buyer-favorable deal terms, extended due diligence and either delays in closing or an inability to close altogether. The panelists also noted an increase in the prevalence of sales under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code.

The panelists, however, were optimistic about deal activity in 2010 and provided recent anecdotal reports of seller-favorable terms for companies that were clearly succeeding despite the economic turmoil. One driver of expected deal activity in 2010 is an estimated $400 billion to $500 billion in committed but uninvested capital, combined with the fact that many funds are approaching deadlines to invest that capital.

The economic downturn has led some funds to restructure existing investments, whether to boost management morale, account for changing conditions or achieve a variety of other objectives. Securing advice from legal advisors with both transactional experience and a practical focus when counseling operating companies was highlighted as a critical factor in the successful and cost-effective implementation of such restructurings.

Lending Activity Up but Still a Long-Term Concern

Lending is critical to getting private equity deals done, especially in a traditional manner. Despite the challenges in 2009, the panelists observed that the availability of lending for private equity transactions is now on the rise. Although they raised concerns regarding future effects from the overhanging debt refinance market (including in commercial real estate) and possible government regulation, the panelists were cautiously optimistic about the lending climate in the latter half of 2010.

In this environment, creative approaches to capital structure are one way to combat a decrease in available senior debt. For example, investors that are able to purchase either debt or equity can provide subordinated debt in addition to equity to support capital requirements. Other strategies include back-ending payments through earn-outs, contingent payments and seller-financed notes. Rollover equity can also be used to plug a gap in the capital structure, including rollover equity with specified redemption terms. These creative approaches can form a bridge to the future, especially where buyers expect a portfolio company will support increased leverage in a future borrowing climate that is presumably more favorable.

Fundraising

Many of our panelists are anticipating a shakeout in the private fund market and agreed that fund teams with long track records of success are likely to suffer less (or possibly benefit) from this downturn. However, some sponsor teams will be unable to raise a next fund, and even those who successfully buck the trend may find that existing limited partners (including those with long-term relationships) may start from square one in their due diligence process when considering a commitment to a next fund.

Particularly for those raising a new fund, the panel noted the need to plan for an unpredictable future. One contingency plan for funds that are not generally seeking pension fund and other ERISA money but expect to make mostly qualifying investments, is to satisfy applicable portfolio requirements under the ERISA plan asset regulation starting with the first investment. This strategy would generally help limited partners who encounter unexpected distress in the future to transfer their commitments, with the fund's permission, in the secondary market, regardless of whether the transferee is governed by ERISA.

Government Regulation

Our panelists noted that the trend of increasing government regulation is both a challenge and, for those companies that can adapt, an opportunity. Health care reform is clearly an area of broad interest, as is the recent HITECH Act, which extends to non-health care companies certain data security requirements and restrictions under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). Other regulatory challenges that may also present opportunities relate to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Red Flags Rule (which regulates the financial services and consumer credit industries), the growing body of federal and state privacy laws, and current uncertainty surrounding the estate tax system. If our 2009 experience is any guide, we may see pressure to close deals in 2010 if there is a threat of increased capital gains rates in 2011 and beyond. And, of course, given current proposals regarding tax rates and tax treatment (some of which could affect carried interests), experienced tax counsel will be necessary for structuring investments in this shifting tax environment.

Final Thoughts

Historically, funds raised immediately following recessions and other significant market downturns have produced substantially improved returns when compared with other vintage years. Predicting economic recovery is obviously challenging and multifaceted, but our panelists found encouraging factors and cautious optimism for 2010.

© 2012 Much Shelist, P.C.

About the Author

Principal

Michael B. Shaw, Co-Chair of the firm’s Business & Finance group, concentrates his practice in corporate law and heads the Private Equity practice. He represents clients in connection with a broad range of transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, private equity and venture capital financings, business succession planning, strategic alliances and joint...

312-521-2610

About the Author

Principal

Gregory D. Grove, a Principal in the firm's Business & Finance group, concentrates his practice on private equity, venture capital and corporate transactions and counseling. He advises funds, boards of directors, management teams, underwriters, and private and public companies at all stages of development, from entrepreneurial to established, operating in a wide range of industries. Greg draws on his training and experience as an electrical engineer...

312-521-2798

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.