May 23, 2012

FINRA Adopts Self-Reporting Requirement – Marks Big Change for Legacy NASD Member Firms

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ("FINRA") has consolidated NASD rule 3070 and NYSE rule 351 on reporting requirements into FINRA rule 4530.  FINRA rule 4530 incorporates most of the current reporting requirements under NASD rule 3070 and NYSE rule 351, pursuant to which member firms are required to report certain disciplinary events involving member firms and their associated persons. Notably, FINRA rule 4530(b) adopts the requirement to report internal conclusions of violations that is akin to the reporting requirement under NYSE rule 351. Specifically, FINRA rule 4530(b) will require member firms to self-report when they have

"concluded or reasonably should have concluded" that associated persons or the member firms themselves "have violated any securities, insurance, commodities, financial or investment-related laws, rules, regulations or standards of conduct of any domestic or foreign regulatory body or self-regulatory organization." 

The requirement to report based upon the "reasonably should have concluded" standard will be new not only for FINRA-only member firms, but also for their legacy NASD regulators.

The Securities and Exchange Commission approved FINRA rule 4530 on November 12, 2010. The rule goes into effect on July 1, 2011. 

The requirement to report internal conclusions of violations is intended to capture violative conduct that is significant, and is not intended for minor rule violations or every internal finding of an exception. To trigger the reporting requirement, the violative conduct must have greater impact.  According to Supplementary Material .01:

"with respect to violative conduct by a member, FINRA expects a member to report only conduct that has widespread or potential widespread impact to the member, its numerous customers, multiple errors or significant dollar amounts. With respect to violative conduct by an associated person, FINRA expects a member to report only conduct that has widespread or potential widespread impact to the member, its customers or the markets, conduct that has a significant monetary result with respect to a member(s), customer(s), or market(s), or multiple instances of any violative conduct." 

Regulatory Notice 11-06 clarifies that specific violations found during internal audits (including, for example, branch office inspections conducted pursuant to NASD rule 3010, or annual supervisory reviews conducted pursuant to FINRA rule 3130) may not necessarily be reportable. Member firms should first determine whether such violations are reportable events under FINRA rule 4530(b).

In determining whether a specific violation is reportable, member firms will be required to apply the "concluded or reasonably should have concluded" standard. FINRA provides in Regulatory Notice 11-06 that the FINRA staff will rely on the member firm's

"good faith reasonable determination"1 regarding whether a violation is reportable. FINRA further provides that, in enforcing rule 4530, it will employ a "reasonable person" standard to determine whether a violation should have been reported.2 The reasonable person standard is a subjective standard that would generally call for the examination of all of the facts and circumstances surrounding a specific internal finding of a violation. FINRA acknowledges the subjective nature of the reasonable person standard: "it may be possible that a department within a firm reaches a conclusion of violation, but on review senior management reaches a different conclusion.  Nothing in the rule prohibits a firm from relying on senior management’s determination, provided such determination is reasonable . . . ."3

To avoid regulatory uncertainty, we recommend that member firms adopt and implement written supervisory procedures requiring reporting decisions to be vetted by designated senior individuals in the compliance and/or legal department. We also recommend that member firms document such consultation and the resulting determination in order to evidence that they have engaged in a process of making a "good faith reasonable determination" in compliance with FINRA rule 4530(b). 

Member firms must report an internal conclusion of violations to FINRA within 30 days of the determination. Beginning July 1, 2011, member firms will be able to make the report through the Rule 4530 Application on the Firm Gateway, which is currently the Regulatory Filings Application. The event code for Rule 4530(b) self reporting is 20.4

____________________

1 Regulatory Notice 11-06 at 2. 
2 Id. 
3 Id.
4 Id. at 7, 16 

© 2012 Bracewell & Giuliani LLP

About the Author

Partner

Julian Rainero is the head of the firm's broker-dealer and market regulation practice. Mr. Rainero advises broker-dealers and alternative trading systems on compliance with SEC, self-regulatory organization (SRO) and Federal Reserve Board rules. His practice involves all aspects of broker-dealer regulation, with particular concentration in correspondent clearing, prime brokerage, net capital, margin, securities lending, customer protection and NYSE and NASDAQ trading practices. Mr. Rainero is a member of the NASDAQ market operations review committee and serves on the...

212.508.6142
Partner

Robert Frenchman has experience representing broker-dealer and other financial services clients in enforcement and other proceedings before the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, and other securities regulators. He has played an important role in regulatory investigations involving, among other things, allocations in initial public offerings, specialist trading, Nasdaq market-making, short selling, securities lending, margin, gifts and gratuities, and research. Mr. Frenchman also has considerable experience drafting and...

212.508.6184

About the Author

Partner

David Sieradzki is a partner in Bracewell & Giuliani LLP's broker-dealer and market regulation practice. His practice focuses on representing broker-dealers, investment advisers and hedge funds in connection with matters arising under federal and state securities laws and self-regulatory organization rules.

Mr. Sieradzki advises securities firms and their employees on complex sales and trading issues affecting the securities markets. His practice encompasses a wide-range of regulatory issues affecting financial services firms and...

202.828.5826

About the Author

Counsel

David Spotts is a member of Bracewell & Giuliani LLP's broker-dealer and market regulation group. He provides comprehensive regulatory advice on compliance with federal, state and self-regulatory organization rules and regulations to clients in the financial services industry, with particular emphasis on broker-dealers, investment advisers, and alternative investment vehicles. He also represents clients in regulatory matters before the SEC, FINRA, NYSE and other SRO’s.

860.256.8539

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.