Advertisement

May 18, 2013

First-Ever Electronic Medical Records and Advanced Imaging Technology Being Brought to 2012 London Olympics

For the first time in Olympic history, advanced imaging technology will be used to help detect athletes’ use of performance-enhancing drugs.  GE Healthcare Life Sciences’ biomolecular imager will lend a big hand in helping to test athletes for recombinant erythropoietin (EPO), a performance-enhancing drug used to boost the number of red blood cells, which enables improved oxygen flow and allows athletes to raise their workout intensity and endurance.  The GE provided equipment, the ImageQuant LAS4000, uses technology that offers extremely detailed information to accurately identify EPO doping.  We first saw the popularity of this drug grow among Tour de France cyclists.

Many other tests will be performed, in addition to the EPO test, in an attempt to create the most advanced drug testing laboratory in the history of the Olympics.  GlaxoSmithKline will be the official lab services provider for the 2012 Olympic and Paralympics Games.  Test results will be analyzed at King’s College London, within an independently operated World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) accredited laboratory.  The average number of samples analyzed throughout the year at King’s College is approximately 7,000, but during the Olympic Games, it is expected that 5,000 samples will be analyzed in only 17 days.

The history of drug testing in the Olympics dates back to the 1968 Olympic Games in Mexico City.  Many notable athletes have had world records and Olympic medals rescinded due to testing positively for performance-enhancing drugs in post-race drug testing, others have had to resign from their Olympic team just weeks before competing on the world stage due to failed drug tests, and still others have received lifetime bans from the games.  With the rapid advancement of technology within medical imaging and testing, we are likely to see a closer eye on the issue of doping in the Olympics.  While we can begin to feel reassurance from advanced testing such as that provided by GE’s ImageQuant, some of us may be watching this year’s Olympic Games with a skeptical eye about what has gone on before…

©2013 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved

About the Author

Partner

Robyn S. Shapiro is a partner in the Health Care Practice Group.  She has significant experience in representing clients with respect to bioethics issues, medical staff matters, health information privacy, informed consent, regulatory and licensing matters, human subjects research compliance and employment and other business issues.  Robyn's past positions as Ursula Von der Ruhr professor of bioethics and director of the Bioethics Center at the Medical College of Wisconsin complement her wide-ranging experience in health law.  Nightingale's...

414-221-6056

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.