May 23, 2012

Fiscal Uncertainty and Recession Could Result in More Property Tax Appeals (NC)

The downtrodden real estate market could have a significant impact on the number of real estate tax appeals lodged by property owners in some North Carolina counties. Under state law, counties are required to conduct county-wide revaluations every eight years, although some counties may choose to revalue more frequently. For 2011, approximately 29 counties were scheduled to revalue real property as of January 1, 2011, including larger counties such as Mecklenburg, Johnston, New Hanover, Catawba and Brunswick.*

With property values declining, especially in coastal communities, local governments will be forced to either raise tax rates or get by with less revenue. As a result, and in an effort to maintain revenue levels, the new valuations assessed by counties may not fully take into account the significant impact the recession has had on property values. Accordingly, the new values assessed in 2011 could be significantly higher than the actual, true market value as of January 1, 2011 and could result in an increased number of tax appeals for 2011. This is especially true for income producing commercial properties that rely upon the income method of valuation in determining market value. Therefore, property owners should carefully review the revaluation notices they have received and be aware of their appeal rights.

In short, each county has a board, often referred to as the Board of Equalization and Review, that is tasked with reviewing and hearing property tax appeals and making a recommendation as to whether a property valuation should be adjusted. Virtually each jurisdiction, however, handles property tax appeals differently and some provide for an informal review procedure prior to a hearing before the Board of Equalization and Review. Regardless, it is important to know when the deadline to file an appeal expires because deadlines are tied to when the Board of Equalization and Review adjourns, which varies from county to county. When filing a tax appeal and/or at the time of the hearing before the Board of Equalization and Review, the taxpayer is required to submit evidence showing that the tax value assigned by the tax assessor does not reflect the property’s actual market value as of the date of revaluation. If a property owner is dissatisfied with the decision of the County Board, they can appeal to the North Carolina State Property Tax Commission, which conducts a more formal, trial-like hearing.

Given that many counties only revalue every eight years, it is important to make sure that the County’s assessed value accurately reflects the property’s market value as of the date of revaluation. Depending on the property’s total value, a reduction in the tax value could represent a significant savings over this eight-year period.

*Other counties scheduled to revalue as of January 1, 2011 include Ashe, Burke, Caldwell, Davidson, Gaston, Haywood, Henderson, Hertford, Iredell, Lincoln, Macon, McDowell, Moore, Northhampton, Pender, Person, Rockingham, Rowan, Rutherford, Sampson, Scotland, Stanly, Wayne and Wilkes

© 2012 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Chad primarily represents land owners, developers and local governments in state and federal court on a myriad of land-use and zoning issues including vested rights, constitutional matters and zoning ordinance interpretations. He also represents land owners and developers before local Boards of Adjustment, Planning Commissions, City Councils, and County Commissioners on matters related to zoning, permitting, variances, annexations, special use permits, site plans, subdivisions and road closings.

Chad has experience representing clients in administrative and civil dispute resolution...

(919) 783-2896

About the Author

Partner

Keith’s practice centers on development or redevelopment of property, and the environmental, utility and land use issues that arise from development projects.

He assists developers and local governments with the planning, permitting and construction of a variety of projects, including convention centers, parks and other public projects, residential developments, and marinas.  He especially enjoys “brownfields” projects, redeveloping contaminated property.  This work in part involves assisting clients with compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act...

(919) 783-1013

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.