July 24, 2014

Fiscal Year (FY) 14 Appropriations Outlook: Stormy Weather Ahead

This week the House Appropriations Committee will start marking up the first fiscal year (FY) 2014 appropriations bill (the Military Construction–Veterans Affairs bill, to be exact).  This will formally kick off what will be a rocky appropriations season.

Let’s start with that fact that there is no agreed upon budget resolution, which means no agreed upon overall budget numbers, which for you real budget geeks out there means no 302(b) allocations (the numbers that the each appropriations subcommittee gets that sets the funding level for their bill).  Not to worry, Congress will likely find a way around the official requirements of all of this, most likely through “deeming” allocations.

Now add the fact that because there is no agreed upon budget the House and the Senate will work off of different overall funding levels for appropriations to the tune of about $91 billion. This is not chump change in a time of already austere funding levels, which are impacting programs that are already starting to really feel the impact of sequestration.

By all accounts, the House is basing its number on the $967 billion budget cap, which includes the sequester, while the Senate has said it is aiming to use a $1.058 trillion cap, and their budget reverses the sequester, as well as include revenue raisers.  This will present a challenge for the relatively non-controversial “Mil-Con” bill, but expect the big fireworks to come when Congress gets to the big bills like Defense and Labor-Health and Human Services-Education (LHHS).  That is if any of these bills get past subcommittee – Congress’ recent track record is not so good on that front.

As I said, hold on to your hat – stormy appropriations weather is in the forecast.

©2014 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved

About the Author

Senior Government Relations Director

Jodie A. Curtis is a senior government relations director in the Washington, D.C., office.  Jodie has considerable experience in government, congressional affairs and health care policy representing and advancing the legislative and regulatory interests of non-profit, advocacy and health organizations.  Her particular strengths are: strategic planning to craft winning tactics for clients to meet their public policy goals, fostering relationships with Congressional Members and staff, working the federal appropriations and authorization processes, building coalitions,...

(202) 230-5147

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.