May 23, 2012

Following a 2-year refusal to comply, anthracite mine operator in Pennsylvania installs mandated communications and tracking system

ARLINGTON, Va. — The U.S. Department of Labor's Mine Safety and Health Administration today announced that S&M Coal Co. has completed installation of a communications and tracking system at Buck Mountain Slope near Lykens, Pa., ending its two-year refusal to comply with requirements mandated in the Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006.

According to the MINER Act, each underground coal mine operator was required to submit an emergency response plan by June 15, 2009, that provided for post-accident communications between underground and surface personnel via a wireless two-way medium, as well as an electronic tracking system permitting surface personnel to determine the location of any people trapped underground.

"The ability to communicate with miners underground and track their whereabouts is a key component during a rescue operation," said Joseph A. Main, assistant secretary of labor for mine safety and health. "This technology, when properly implemented, will go a long way in giving miners the best possible chance for survival in the event of a mine emergency."

A number of anthracite mine operators expressed concerns that radio emissions from these systems might interfere with blasting detonators used to extract coal underground. Consequently, MSHA coordinated with companies that developed communications and tracking systems, and tested one of the systems near blasting circuits at the 7 Ft. Slope Mine in New Philadelphia, Pa. The results demonstrated that radio frequency interference levels associated with available systems would not result in unintended detonation.

After receiving these results, most of the anthracite mine operators still refused to submit emergency response plans that provided for mandated communications and tracking systems. Consequently, each of those operators received a citation for violating the MINER Act requirement. The contested citations were upheld in separate proceedings by administrative law judges with the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, who found that electronic tracking and two-way communication systems are safe and effective for use in underground anthracite mines and ordered that emergency response plans be submitted for approval by MSHA's district manager. Following the administrative law judges' decisions, several of the operators worked with MSHA's district office in Wilkes-Barre, Pa., to develop emergency response plans that specified the use of congressionally-mandated communications and tracking systems, and the district manager approved their revised plans.

However, S&M Coal Co. continued to conduct mining operations without submitting a compliant emergency response plan, prompting MSHA to file a lawsuit against the mine on April 21 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District Court of Pennsylvania to ask for preliminary and permanent injunctions against S&M. The judge granted MSHA's motion for a preliminary injunction on July 6 and, although the agency's request for a permanent injunction remains pending, S&M has agreed to install the communications and tracking system, making it the last anthracite mine operator to do so.

© Copyright 2012 U.S. Department of Labor

About the Author

Our Mission is to foster, promote, and develop the welfare of the wage earners, job seekers, and retirees of the United States; improve working conditions; advance opportunities for profitable employment; and assure work-related benefits and rights.

866-487-2365

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.