May 23, 2012

Foreclosure Mediation Program on Its Way to Cook County

Much Shelist

The Cook County Board of Commissioners has agreed to provide Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans with $3.5 million to establish a mediation program devoted exclusively to resolving mortgage foreclosures. The idea behind the program is to determine if some of the nearly 50,000 foreclosure actions that will likely have been filed by the end of 2009 in Cook County can be resolved out of court.

The Cook County courts have been under enormous pressure to bring closure to the massive number of cases that have been filed as a result of the economic downturn. In many of the residential foreclosure matters, for example, the borrowers cannot afford counsel and end up representing themselves. This can lengthen the process by which a foreclosure case goes through the system because unrepresented borrowers simply are unaware of court rules, and judges are willing to grant them leeway during these troubled times.

At this point, it is unclear how the mediation program will work. Will participation in the program be mandatory? Will it only involve residential (as opposed to commercial) foreclosures? Despite the many questions, one thing is for sure. Now that the program has significant funding, it is here to stay.

Much Shelist will continue to provide updates regarding the status of the mediation program and how it might affect lenders and borrowers. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me or your attorney.

© 2010 Much Shelist Denenberg Ament & Rubenstein, P.C.

About the Author

Principal

Edward D. Shapiro focuses his practice on the efficient prevention, management and resolution of disputes for commercial entities, organizations and individuals. Serving as Chair of the firm's Litigation & Dispute Resolution practice group, Ed advises and represents clients in state and federal court, before administrative agencies, and in mediation and arbitration in a full range of business matters.

312-521-2421

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.