July 25, 2014

From Frying Pan to Fire: Chicago Employers May Lose Business Licenses Following Wage and Hour Violations

If statutory damages, attorneys’ fees, and recently enacted criminal penalties were not incentives enough for Chicago employers to follow wage and hour laws, consider this: the City of Chicago has now enacted an ordinance that allows the city to deny or revoke business licenses for companies failing to properly pay overtime or minimum wage. The Windy City is now the largest municipality in the United States to adopt so-called “wage theft” laws, following a nationwide trend of imposing additional penalties on employers that violate wage and hour laws. It is also worth noting that, although it is no longer unusual to see another locality adopt such a measure, Chicago’s approach is unusually harsh because it subjects violating establishments to potential revocation or denial of a business license.

Under current federal and state law, it is illegal to withhold an employee's wages, fail to pay overtime, or pay below minimum wage. On January 17, 2013, the Chicago City Council took a step further and unanimously passed measure SO2012-8533, an ordinance that amends the business license suspension and revocation provisions of the Municipal Code of Chicago. The law, which becomes effective on July 1, 2013, authorizes the City’s Commissioner of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection to penalize businesses that are found to have violated any other federal or state law regulating the payment of wages.

The Commissioner is empowered to deny a license to a business if the applicant has willfully violated wage and hour laws or committed two or more non-willful violations. The Commissioner may also suspend or revoke the license of any existing business that admits or is found liable for wage violations in a judicial or administrative proceeding. In other words, any business in Chicago is now subject to having its license revoked upon any finding or admission of a wage and hour violation.

As a consequence of the city's expansive powers, businesses with operations in Chicago need to monitor, more closely than ever before, any proceeding where they might be found liable for a wage and hour violation. For instance, any company contemplating settling such proceedings, whether administrative or judicial, should carefully consider admitting liability as part of settlement, as this admission could jeopardize its ability to conduct business in the city. In the end, even if the risk of revocation is minimal, companies may nevertheless face another protracted legal proceeding (i.e., a license hearing) after having already gone through an initial—and equally lengthy—wage and hour proceeding.

© 2014 Much Shelist, P.C.

About the Author


Christopher L. Nybo represents employers in all types of employment matters and disputes, including defending wrongful discharge, discrimination, harassment and wage and hour claims. He regularly represents clients before federal and state courts, as well as state and local administrative agencies such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Illinois Department of Labor and the Illinois Department of Human Rights.


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.