Advertisement

April 17, 2014

FTC Announces New Filing Thresholds for Hart-Scott-Rodino Pre-Merger Notifications

The Federal Trade Commission has announced the new notification thresholds for pre-merger notification reports that must be filed under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (HSR Act). The notification thresholds are adjusted every year for inflation. The new thresholds go into effect on February 11, 2013.

Under the HSR Act, mergers or acquisitions of voting securities, interests in unincorporated entities such as LLCs, and assets are subject to pre-merger notification filing with the FTC and the Department of Justice if the transaction and the parties to the transaction exceed a certain size.

Under the new notification thresholds, the “Size of Transaction” test will increase from $68.2 million to $70.9 million. Therefore, no HSR filing will be required if, as a result of the acquisition, the acquiring person will hold less than $70.9 million of voting stock, unincorporated entity interests and assets of the acquired person.

The thresholds used for the “Size of Person” test have increased as well. Under the revised thresholds, one of the “Persons” involved in the transaction, as defined in the HSR Rules, must have net sales or total assets of at least $14.2 million and the other “Person” must have net sales or total assets of at least $141.8 million. It should be noted that the “Size of Person” test does not apply for transactions valued above $283.6 million.

Under the new thresholds, the HSR filing fees apply as follows:

Fee Transaction Size
$45,000 $70.9 million - $141.8 million
$125,000 $141.8 million - $709.1 million
$280,000 $709.1 million and above

Read more.

©2014 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

About the Author

James J. Calder, Antitrust Attorney, Katten Muchin law firm
Partner

James J. Calder devotes his practice to antitrust and competition law. He is co-head of the firm’s Antitrust and Competition practice.

James’ antitrust practice includes litigation, counseling and responding to government antitrust investigations. He handles matters involving price fixing, market allocation, group boycotts and other horizontal restraints; monopolization, intellectual property licensing and other intellectual property issues; industry-wide standard setting efforts; vertical restraints; distribution issues; and Robinson-Patman Act problems.

212-940-6460

About the Author

Bonnie Lynn Chmil, Litigation Attorney, Katten Muchin Law firm
Associate

Bonnie Lynn Chmil concentrates her practice in litigation. She has represented clients in a wide range of matters involving commercial contracts, lender liability, trusts and estates, securities, antitrust, regulatory inquiries, intellectual property, financial services, employment, bankruptcy adversary claims and statutory and common law claims.

212-940-6415

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal