Advertisement

May 20, 2013

FTC Announces Revised Monetary Exemptions Under The Franchise Rule

The Federal Trade Commission (the “Commission”) recently announced an amendment to its “Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising” (16 C.F.R. Part 436) (the “Franchise Rule”) revising the monetary limits for three of the listed exemptions. Under these exemptions, a company that would otherwise qualify as a “franchisor” as defined under the Franchise Rule is excused from the Rule’s disclosure requirement if its offer and sale of franchises falls within one of these exceptions. The exemptions that were amended are:

  1. Minimum Payment Exemption. This exemption will apply when the total of the required payments (or commitments to make a required payment) to the franchisor or affiliate from before to within six months after the franchisee commences operation of his or her business is less than $500. Effective July 1, 2012, the monetary limit under this exemption was increased from $500 to $540.
  2. Large Franchise Investment Exemption. This exemption permits a franchisor to avoid the disclosure requirement when the franchisee’s initial investment will be $1 million or more, excluding the cost of unimproved land and any financing by the franchisor or its affiliate. Effective July 1, 2012, this exemption was increased from $1 million to $1,084,900.
  3. Large Franchisee Exemption. This exemption is limited to circumstances in which the franchise offer or sale is made to a large entity (such as an airport, casino, hospital, or university) that has been in business for at least five years and has a net worth of at least $5 million. Effective July 1, 2012, this exemption was increased from $5 million to $5,424,500.

Among the revisions that were made in the 2007 amendments to the Franchise Rule was the requirement for the Commission to raise the monetary thresholds for the above exemptions every four years to adjust for inflation. These inflationary adjustments are tied to the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers published by the Department of Labor (“CPI”). According to the Commission, between 2007 and 2011 the annual average value of the CPI increased by 8.49 percent, which resulted in the above increases.

© Copyright 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP. All rights reserved

About the Author

Partner

Matt Kreutzer serves as Chair of the firm's Franchise, Distribution and Antitrust practice group and is a Certified Specialist in Franchise and Distribution Law by the California State Bar's Board of Legal Specialization. He has spent more than a decade working with individuals and companies on issues relating to franchise law and is well-versed in all stages of the franchise relationship. 

702-678-5070

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.