August 21, 2014
August 20, 2014
August 19, 2014
FTC Delays Identity Theft Red Flags Rule for Fourth Time
On October 30, 2009, just two days before the November 1 enforcement date, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") delayed yet again enforcement of the Identity Theft Red Flags Rule until June 1, 2010. The rule was delayed "[a]t the request of Members of Congress," according to an FTC statement.
Controversy continues to swirl around certain entities covered by the rule. The controversial part of the rule requires "creditors" of certain accounts to implement an Identity Theft and Prevention Program to identify, detect, and respond to patterns, practices, or specific activities - called "red flags" - that could indicate identity theft.
Under the rule, creditors are defined as entities that regularly extend or renew credit or arrange for others to do so, and include any entity that regularly permits deferred payment for goods and services. Entities subject to the rule include those that permit payment after products are sold or services rendered, e.g., health care providers, accountants, retailers, and non-profit organizations. (See July 28, 2009, Alert for details on the Red Flags Rule.)
Objecting to the inclusion of lawyers under the rule, the American Bar Association ("ABA") sued the FTC alleging (i) it exceeded its authority in seeking to impose the rule on attorneys and (ii) Congress intended to apply the rule to financial institutions and other entities that extend credit, not attorneys who merely bill for services after they are performed. On October 29, 2009, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted the ABA's motion for an injunction prohibiting the FTC from extending the rule to the legal profession.
Further, on October 20, 2009, the House of Representatives passed a bill to exclude health care, accounting, and legal practices with 20 or fewer employees from application under the rule. In addition, the bill would require the FTC to issue regulations allowing all businesses to apply for an exemption from the rule. A company would be eligible for an exemption if the FTC determines that it knows all of its customers or clients individually, only performs services at customer residences, or has not faced identity theft problems, and identity theft is rare for its type of business. The legislation is now working its way through the Senate.
 Federal Trade Commission, Office of Public Affairs, FTC Extends Enforcement Deadline for Identity Theft Red Flags Rule (October 30, 2009), available at http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/10/redflags.shtm.
 American Bar Association v. FTC, No. 09-1636 (D.D.C. Oct. 29, 2009).
 H.R. 3763, 111th Cong. (2009).
<span class="advertise"> Advertisement </span>
- Government Safety Agencies Set Regulatory Agendas
- DOJ Touts Active Enforcement of the False Claims Act in FY 2012
- Chamber Seeks Cash From Insurers, Financial Firms For New Effort, Health Reform and Financial Rules Targeted by Anti-Regulation Drive; EPA Rules Too
- “Red Flag Rules” 609 Will Impose Additional Administrative Burdens on Hospitals
- FTC Settlement Requires Fandango and Credit Karma to Establish Comprehensive Security Programs to Protect Consumers’ Sensitive Personal Information
- The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Recent Developments: July 14, 2014 - July 18, 2014