Advertisement

July 28, 2014

GAO (Government Accountability Office) Recommends Federal Action on Ammonium Nitrate

A deadly explosion at a fertilizer plant last year has a government watchdog agency calling on federal agencies to assume a greater role in preventing accidents from ammonium nitrate (AN). 

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has recommended that OSHA, EPA and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) take action after its investigation found numerous gaps in federal oversight of AN facilities. GAO’s investigation was launched at the request of members of Congress after some 30 tons of AN detonated during a fire at a plant in West, Texas in April 2013. The incident resulted in the deaths of more than a dozen people and extensive property damage. 

OSHA’s explosives regulations,, which have not been significantly revised since 1971, apply to AN facilities. The OSHA regulations allow the substance to be stored in wooden buildings, which increases the fire and explosion hazard, GAO said in a report released May 21. In addition, GAO asserted OSHA has done little outreach to increase awareness of its rules within the fertilizer industry, a primary user of AN. OSHA’s high hazard workplace inspection program does not target AN facilities and, according to GAO, information on these facilities is not available to OSHA to use for targeting. 

Other OSHA and EPA chemical safety regulations require facilities to complete hazard assessments, use procedures to prevent and respond to accidents and conduct routine compliance audits, but the rules do not apply to AN, according to GAO. 

GAO said the total number and location of U.S. facilities storing AN is unknown. However, the facilities that reported to DHS as having reportable quantities of ammonium nitrate were most often engaged in supplying and supporting the agriculture and mining industries. Neither OSHA nor EPA has reporting requirements; however, DHS requires facilities storing reportable quantities to provide the information for security purposes. Federal law also requires certain facilities to report their AN holdings to state and local agencies for emergency response purposes, but the data is not routinely shared with federal authorities. Under a 2013 Executive Order, federal agencies are exploring options for improving data sharing, but this effort remains unfinished. 

“Federal data provide insight into the number of facilities in the United States with ammonium nitrate, but do not provide a complete picture because of reporting exemptions and other data limitations,” GAO wrote. 

Federal agencies should improve data sharing among themselves and with the states, OSHA and EPA should consider revising their related regulations to cover AN, and OSHA ought to conduct outreach to the fertilizer industry and target high risk facilities for inspection, GAO recommended. 

Steps to improve communications have already been taken, the auditors noted in their report. For instance, OSHA recently published information and updated its website to explain how its regulations on explosives and blasting agents at 29 CFR 1910.109 apply to AN fertilizer, what legal requirements apply and how to store and handle AN safely. An August 2013 advisory – issued jointly by OSHA, EPA and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms – highlighted OSHA’s regulations for fertilizer-grade AN. 

Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2014

About the Author

Bradford T. Hammock workplace safety law attorney Jackson Lewis law firm
Shareholder

Bradford T. Hammock is a Shareholder in the Washington, D.C. Region office of Jackson Lewis P.C.  He focuses his practice in the safety and health area, and is Leader of the firm’s Workplace Safety and Health practice group.

Mr. Hammock’s national practice focuses on all aspects of occupational safety and health law.  In particular, Mr. Hammock provides invaluable assistance to employers in a preventive practice:  (1) conducting full-scale safety and health compliance audits; (2) reviewing and revising corporate safety and health...

(703) 483-8300

About the Author

Henry Chajet environmental attorney Jackson Lewis Law firm
Shareholder

Henry Chajet is a a Shareholder in the Washington, D.C. Region office of Jackson Lewis P.C.

Mr. Chajet counsels and represents clients in environmental, health and safety (EH&S) matters and antitrust matters, focusing on crisis management, dispute resolution, trial and appellate litigation, standard setting, liability prevention, regulatory and congressional proceedings and “direct purchaser” overcharge recoveries for corporate clients in antitrust price manipulation cases. He defends investigations and enforcement actions by the Occupational Safety and Health...

(703) 483-8300
Mark Savit government investigations attorney at Jackson Lewis Law firm
Shareholder

Mark Savit is a Shareholder in the Denver office of Jackson Lewis. Mr. Savit counsels clients in government investigations, and on regulatory matters, to help limit civil liabilities, prevent criminal prosecutions, and promote sound health, safety and environmental policies. Mr. Savit has expertise in health and safety law, industrial disaster response and environmental law  and related litigation and legislative services. Mr. Savit began his career at the Department of the Interior where he headed the special investigation unit of the Mining Enforcement and Safety Administration....

303) 892-0404

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texa