April 25, 2014

German Federal Cartel Office Levies Administrative Fine Due to Incomplete Merger Notification

The German Act against Restraints on Competition (ARC) requires each company participating in the merger to report information on all the companies affiliated with it.  This includes intra-group relationships, controlling relationships and interests held by the affiliated companies.  This obligation also applies to the companies or shareholders controlling the notifying company.  Fines of up to €100,000 may be imposed, not only on the notifying company but also potentially on the individuals who control it, for the submission of incomplete, incorrect or late notifications.

The notification in question concerned plans by slaughterhouse operator Tönnies to merge with another independent slaughterhouse operator.  While the notification contained information on the affiliation of the notifying company itself, it did not contain information with respect to the majority shareholdings held, through a trustee, by Tönnies’ principal shareholder in Germany’s largest sausage manufacturer, Mühlen Group. 

After the notification had been submitted, the FCO sent to Tönnies and other slaughterhouse operators a request for information on the group structure of Tönnies.  Tönnies answered that no affiliations existed with respect to the wholesale pork and sausage manufacturing market.  The FCO had, however, obtained information that suggested links between Tönnies and the Mühlen Group.  When asked explicitly in another information request if such links existed, Tönnies admitted that its principal shareholder held majority shares in the Mühlen Group, and provided contractual agreements showing that the voting rights were exercised by a trustee who was responsible to the principle shareholder of Tönnies.  Since this principle shareholder controlled Tönnies, all the companies he controlled had to be added to the notification.  The FCO informed the notifying parties that it considered the notification to be incomplete as this information was missing.  The planned acquisition was ultimately prohibited in late 2012 by the FCO, although the appeal is still pending.

The principal shareholder—a natural person—is the addressee of the fine amounting to €90,000.  He agreed to a settlement and admitted to supplying the incomplete notification.  Because of this admission, the FCO did not impose the maximum fine that it could levy in connection with an incomplete notification. 

Administrative fines for incomplete information have been rare until recently.  The FCO has demonstrated, however, that the merger notifications it receives must be complete and correct.  Companies should therefore make sure that they submit all the information they are legally obliged to provide, and must ensure particularly that the entities controlling the notifying party also supply all the information pertaining to their controlling interests in other companies.

© 2014 McDermott Will & Emery

About the Author

Robert Bäuerle, Antitrust Attorney, McDermott Will Emery law firm

Robert Bäuerle is an associate in the international law firm of McDermott Will & Emery, based in its Brussels office.  His practice focuses on German and European competition law including merger control and state aid law.  

Before joining McDermott Will & Emery, Robert gained experience in  the competition group of an international law firm in Berlin and Brussels, as well as in the state aid control unit of the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology. 

32 2 282 35 23

About the Author


Martina Maier is a partner in the international law firm of McDermott Will & Emery, based in its Brussels office. Martina is head of the firm’s European Antitrust and Competition Practice Group and her practice focuses on German and European competition law, including State aid, single firm conduct, merger control and agreements restricting competition.   She has extensive experience in representing clients in a broad range of industries before the European Commission and national competition authorities and courts.

32 2 282 35 66

Philipp Werner is a partner in the international law firm of McDermott Will & Emery, based in its Brussels office.   His practice focuses on European and German competition law including State aid, merger control, cartels and abuse of dominance, and his clients include companies in the automotive, infrastructure, transport and health care sectors.

32 2 282 35 67

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of P