Advertisement

May 23, 2013

"Going Back to School" - NLRB To Review Graduate Student Assistant Issue (Again)

Barnes & Thornburg LLP - a national law firm of more than 550 professionals
Peter T. Tschanz
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Saturday, June 23, 2012
Administrative & Regulatory / Labor & Employment / Public Education & Services
All Federal
Printer-friendly
Email this Article
Download PDF
Reprints & Permissions

Are graduate student assistants seeking to be represented by a union employees under the National Labor Relations Act?  That is a question the NLRB is intent on answering (again).  The Board has granted review in two cases addressing the issue.  The Board also invited briefs from interested parties, asking, among other things, whether its 2004 decision in Brown University should be overruled. In that case the Board held that graduate student assistants typically were not considered statutory employees. The Brown decision overruled a 2000 decision in New York University, which held that graduate assistants were statutory employees.

This is yet another example of how the once relatively obscure federal agency is taking steps (in this case potentially flip-flopping positions) to solidify its position as the “champion” of employee rights.

© 2013 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Peter T. Tschanz
Associate

Peter T. Tschanz is an associate in the Indianapolis office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, where he is a member of the Labor & Employment Law Department. Mr. Tschanz concentrates his practice in representing management interests in both employment litigation and traditional labor matters.

Peter.Tschanz@btlaw.com
317-231-6452
www.btlaw.com

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.