Advertisement

May 19, 2013

H-1B Cap Season in Full Swing for April 1st Filings

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

On April 1, 2010, U.S. employers may again file H-1B (specialty occupational professional) work visa petitions soliciting U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ("USCIS") approval that will be effective on October 1, 2010, the first day of the next federal year. The H-1B visa category, which includes a total of 85,000 "slots" per fiscal year, reached its limit for FY2010 on December 21, 2009.

Although the FY2010 cap was not reached during the first week of April 2009 as it had been in recent years, this is still an important time for employers to consider filing H-1B cases for FY2011. Filing early will best secure H-1B status for new hires and changes of status for existing employees who have time-limited work authorizations, such as L-1 intracompany transferees.

H-1B status is valuable for those employees who will be sponsored for permanent resident (green card) status because they may be eligible for extensions of H-1B status beyond the usual limit of six years. Given the considerable delays in the government's handling of permanent resident cases, the extended ability to maintain work authorization in the H-1B category is particularly valuable.

© 2013 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Gregory P. Adams is a Partner in the Corporate Department and Chair of the Immigration Practice Group. Greg concentrates his practice on U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law. He counsels domestic and international businesses, educational institutions, and not-for-profit entities regarding temporary and permanent business-, employment-, and investment-related U.S. visas. He has represented high tech (Route 128/495) clients on immigration cases for two decades, including development of immigration policies and the architecture and procedures for handling large volumes of cases. Greg also...

513-977-8125

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.