Advertisement

April 17, 2014

Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Thresholds Increase for 2013

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has announced revisions to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (HSR Act) thresholds, which will become effective on February 11, 2013. The revised thresholds will apply to any transaction closing on or after the effective date. The FTC is required to adjust the HSR thresholds annually based upon the change in gross national product. 

Under the HSR Act, when a deal satisfies the "size of person" and "size of transaction" thresholds, and no exemption from reporting is available, the deal must be reported to the FTC and the U.S. Department of Justice and the parties must wait for a designated period of time before closing the transaction.

Size of Person. The revised size of person threshold will be met if one party involved in the deal has assets or annual sales totaling $141.8 million or more and one other party involved in the deal has assets or annual sales of at least $14.2 million. Satisfaction of the size of person threshold is not required, however, if the transaction is valued at more than $283.6 million.

Size of Transaction. The revised size of transaction threshold will be met if the buyer will hold an aggregate amount of stock, non-corporate interests and/or assets of the seller valued at more than $70.9 million as a result of the deal.  

The notification thresholds applicable to voting security purchases by minority owners also will increase.

February 1, 2001 Thresholds (Original)

Current Thresholds as of February 27, 2012

New Thresholds Effective February 11, 2013

$50 million

$68.2 million

$70.9 million

$100 million

$136.4 million

$141.8 million

$500 million

$682.1 million

$709.1 million

25% if worth more than
$1 billion

25% if worth more than  $1.3641 billion

25% if worth more than    $1.4181 billion

50% if worth more than
$50 million

50% if worth more than $68.2 million

50% if worth more than       $70.9 million

In addition, the thresholds applicable to many exemptions, including those governing foreign acquisitions, will increase. The $500 million threshold applicable to acquisitions of producing oil and gas reserves and associated assets will not change.

Failing to comply with the notification and waiting period requirements of the HSR Act can result in a civil penalty of up to $16,000 per day for each day a party is in violation.

© 2014 Bracewell & Giuliani LLP

About the Author

Partner

Daniel Hemli advises clients on antitrust issues relating to mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures, and advocacy before federal, state and foreign antitrust authorities. He has represented parties in connection with investigations of numerous national and multinational acquisitions and joint venture transactions across a broad range of industries, including oil and gas, electric power, pharmaceuticals, medical devices and equipment, technology and software, chemicals, banking and financial services, consumer products, entertainment and media, and agriculture. He has...

212.938.6402

About the Author

Counsel

Jacqueline (Jackie) Java focuses her practice on antitrust counseling. She advises clients involved in transactions and day-to-day operations that raise antitrust issues regarding interactions among competitors, the formation of joint ventures, distribution and pricing policies and programs, information exchanges, and allegations of price fixing, market allocation, and other anticompetitive practices. She is particularly experienced in managing complex relationships in industries where companies simultaneously act as competitors, customers and collaborators.

...
202-828-5828

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.