May 23, 2012

Health Care Fraud Penalties May Be On the Rise

On January 26th, the Senate Judiciary Committee addressed fraud enforcement in their first hearing of the new Congressional session. In this most recent hearing, the Judiciary Committee placed special emphasis on health care fraud. The federal government estimates between $45 billion to $75 billion is paid to health care “fraudsters” each year. In fiscal year 2009, the federal government recovered $2.5 billion from health care fraud cases. Lawmakers want to close that recovery gap with more civil recoveries, criminal investigations, prosecutions, and convictions.

Lawmakers are concerned that medical professionals have become accustomed to paying their way out of these claims as part of the cost of doing business. As a result, they want the Justice Department to increase prosecutions of not only the businesses and organizations that violate federal laws but also go after the individuals within the organizations. In these economic times, the recovery of fraudulently paid funds and the income through fines and penalties are an attractive political subject. But the Judiciary Committee voiced more than its desire to increase fines, the Committee emphasized the need to increase prison sentences for violating heath care anti-fraud laws. Lawmakers see jail time as a powerful deterrent to health care fraud. Many courts can be more lenient in sentencing health care fraud crimes over violent crimes and the Committee wants to see that health care “fraudsters” are put behind bars.

The subject of the first Judiciary Committee hearing of the 112th Congress signals that a crackdown on federal fraud is a top priority for the lawmakers. The current leadership of the Senate Judiciary Committee (Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-VT and Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-IA) have been very active in strengthening federal fraud laws. Sen. Leahy and Sen. Grassley authored numerous anti-fraud acts, including the 1986 amendments to the federal False Claims Act and the recent Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act. This hearing early in the 112th Congress indicates that the lawmakers may be sharpening their pencils to strengthen fraud enforcement further in new legislation. Proposals may include increasing fines, increasing jail time, requiring more frequent progress reports on health care fraud prosecutions from the Department of Justice, and increasing funding for fraud prosecutions. One way or another, federal oversight of health care fraud will only be strengthened in the coming years. As a result, health care providers are encouraged to review and update their compliance programs or risk stiffer fines in the future or even jail time.

© 2012 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

D. Michael Crites is a Partner in the Litigation Department. Mr. Crites focuses his practice on federal court experience in complex civil litigation and white collar criminal matters, including healthcare fraud, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act compliance issues and Federal False Claims Act Violations. He has extensive experience in complex civil and criminal litigation, product liability defense of manufacturers and suppliers, fiduciary litigation, criminal tax and securities fraud defense, and business litigation involving contract disputes, copyright, trademark, trade secret...

614-628-6934

About the Author

Associate

Laura Hartnett is a member of the Litigation Department. She focuses her practice on general commercial litigation with an emphasis on health care and real estate law.

614-628-6930

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.