May 23, 2012

Health Care Reform: How Will it Affect School Districts?

On March 23, 2010, the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("PPACA") was signed into law. The legislation mandates widespread health care reform that will be implemented over the next several years. The following is a brief summary of those provisions of the PPACA that may affect health insurance plans provided by school districts.

W-2 Reporting

For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010, employers must report on their employee's W-2 form the full premium value of their employee health coverage, including but not limited to the value of prescription drug plans and employee assistance programs.

Market Reforms

The PPACA will mandate new coverage requirements for health insurance plans, often referred to as market reforms. These market reforms include, but are not limited to: participant's choice of primary care providers; full coverage for preventative care; reimbursement of emergency service expenses as in-network even if an out-of-network provider is used; certain limitations on when insurance may be rescinded; and no lifetime limits on the dollar value of essential health benefits.

Grandfathered Plans

Grandfathered health plans (i.e. plans which an individual has been continuously enrolled since the March 23, 2010 enactment of the PPACA) are exempt from many of the PPACA's new market reforms. However, even grandfathered health plans must comply with the following:
 

  • no lifetime limits on the dollar value of certain essential health benefits
  • prohibition on recessions (only for fraud and misrepresentation)
  • no preexisting condition exclusions on enrollees under the age of 19
  • adult children covered up to age 26 regardless of their marital status or whether they are still enrolled in school

A health plan will lose grandfathered status if:

  1. Benefits are significantly cut or reduced. (i.e. the new plan no longer provides coverage for certain diseases or medical conditions that were previously covered)
  2. Co-insurance charges are raised. Grandfathered plans cannot increase the percentage that an employee pays on a particular charge (i.e. the percentage paid on a hospital bill, etc.).
  3. Co-pays are significantly increased. Grandfathered plans will be able increase co-pays by no more than the greater of $5 (adjusted annually for medical inflation) or a percentage equal to medical inflation plus 15 percentage points.
  4. Deductibles are significantly raised. Grandfathered plans can only increase these deductibles by a percentage equal to medical inflation plus 15 percentage points from the plan that was in effect on March 23, 2010.
  5. Employer's contribution rate is significantly reduced. Grandfathered plans cannot reduce the amount of an employer's contributions by more than 5 percentage points below the contribution rate in effect on March 23, 2010.
  6. The plan adds or tightens the limit on what the insurer pays. If no cap exists, new plans cannot add a cap on the amount an insurer pays for covered services and still retain grandfathered status. If a cap already exists, the new plan cannot tighten any dollar limit that was in place on March 23, 2010.
  7. The Employer changes insurance companies. This does not apply when employers that provide their own insurance to their workers switch plan administrators or to collectively bargained agreements.

Collectively Bargained Plans

Collectively bargained health plans that were in effect prior to March 23, 2010 are exempt from the requirements of the new law until the date on which the CBA providing health coverage terminates.
After the CBA terminates, any proposed new plan must be reviewed in comparison to the plan in effect on March 23, 2010 under the general grandfather provisions set forth above.

Conclusions

Any school district contemplating a plan change to control costs should proceed with caution. School districts should assess whether a plan change will cause it to lose grandfathered status. Increased coverage requirements mandated by the loss of grandfathered status could potentially offset the potential cost savings brought about by implementing a new health plan.
 

© 2012 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

David Lampe is a Partner in the Labor and Employment Law Department and Education Law Practice Group. David has extensive experience counseling public boards of education on a variety of education law issues, with an emphasis on labor negotiations, employment matters, civil litigation and workers' compensation. In addition to his legal practice, David is a frequent presenter at various law school forums across the State of Ohio.
 

513-977-8234

About the Author

Partner

Catherine S. Wright is a Partner in the Labor and Employment Law Department. Catherine provides employment advice to clients, conducts training, and provides investigation assistance. She has defended against state and federal administrative complaints and handles employment litigation stemming from civil rights claims, the Family Medical Leave Act, and wage-and-hour issues. She has experience representing public employers, including public schools and the Commonwealth of Kentucky, defending First Amendment-based and Section 1983 actions. She has worked extensively with nonprofit...

859-425-1068

Contributors

Partner

Jan E. Hensel is a Partner in the Labor and Employment Department.  Ms. Hensel devotes her practice exclusively to the representation of employers in the employment law arena. She consults with employers of all sizes to help them comply with the myriad of State and Federal employment laws that affect the workplace, including the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Americans With Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII and the Ohio Civil Rights Act. Ms. Hensel frequently conducts onsite trainings and seminars...

614-227-4267

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.