May 23, 2012

HHS Finds “Unreasonable” Rate Hikes Using ACA Rate Review Authority

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced January 12, 2012  that premium increases proposed by an insurer in five states were “unreasonable” and “excessive.” HHS has authority under the Affordable Care Act to review premium increases over 10% to determine if such increases are reasonable. If HHS determines that a premium increase is unreasonable, the insurance company must post a justification on its website within 10 days.

The rate increase at issue in yesterday’s announcement is a 13% increase by Trustmark Life Insurance Company which would affect approximately 10,000 residents in Alabama, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wyoming. In addition, small businesses in Alabama and Arizona experienced rate increases of 27.2% and 18.1%, respectively, when combined with other rate increases over the last year. After a review by independent experts, HHS concluded that Trustmark’s rate increases were unreasonable because (1) the insurer would be spending a low percent of premium dollars on actual medical care and quality improvement and (2) Trustmark’s justifications were based on unreasonable assumptions.

This is not the first rate increase that HHS has found “excessive” under HHS’ rate review authority. HHS determined that a November 2011 12% rate increase for small businesses in Pennsylvania was excessive. A majority of states also have the authority to review rate increases to determine if they are unreasonable.

Additional information regarding HHS’ rate review authority and process is available here.

©2012 von Briesen & Roper, s.c

About the Author

Meghan O’Connor is a member of the Health Care Practice Group. Her practice focuses on general health law including managed care and provider contracting, risk management, and regulatory compliance.

Prior to joining von Briesen, Meghan worked for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services where she consulted with states regarding federal health law, regulation and policy, evaluating managed care contracts and conducting compliance reviews.

414-287-1586

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.