May 24, 2012

House Bill Would Mandate Minimum Wage for Disabled Workers

A bill has been introduced in the House of Representatives that would end the issuance of special certificates that allow employers to pay employees with disabilities below minimum wage.

Under current federal law, the Secretary of Labor can grant special wage certificates to employers of workers with disabilities exempting those disabled workers from Fair Labor Standards Act minimum wage requirements. The text of H.R. 3086, entitled the “Fair Wages for Workers with Disabilities Act of 2011,” states that the current law dates back eighty years to a time when there were few opportunities for disabled workers in the mainstream workforce. The bill cites advancements in vocational rehabilitation, technology, and training as allowing disabled workers to be as productive as non-disabled workers, resulting in a dramatic increase in the number of disabled employees in the workforce and eliminating any need for the current practice.

The proposed legislation was introduced October 4, 2011, by Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.) and is co-sponsored by Rep. Tim Bishop (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Gregg Harper (R-Mo.). It has been referred to the House Education and Workforce Committee. If the bill becomes law, special wage certificates would no longer be issued, and existing certificates issued to private, for-profit employers would be revoked one year after the bill’s enactment. Those issued to public entities and non-profits would be revoked after two years and three years, respectively.

We here at the GT L&E Blog will monitor this bill and keep our readers informed about any developments.

©2012 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Virginia E. Robinson focuses her practice in the areas of labor and employment and civil litigation. Virginia has a strong courtroom background, and she assists clients with a variety of employment issues, including claims of discrimination and retaliation.

703-749-1385

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.