Advertisement

April 17, 2014

How Kentucky Got Lucky: The Success of kynect.gov

It is no secret that the federal HealthCare.gov has received less than rave reviews since its October 1st roll-out. The states who have relied on the federal government to run their marketplaces have encountered numerous problems, from glitches to process delays to complete inaccessibility. Kentucky (the only southern state which opted to run its own health insurance marketplace and expand Medicaid), however, has shone like a beacon in the turbulent exchange introduction period. It is quite surprising that Kentucky, consistently near the bottom in health rankings and with approximately 625,000 uninsured citizens, would be the model for anything health care-related. Here is how Kentucky is leading the nation with its exchange site:

1) Repeated testing

Carrie Banahan, kynect’s executive director, said testing was a crucial part of the design process. According to her, from January 2013 – March, the system was developed; from April – June, it was built; from July – September, it was tested. In contrast, HealthCare.gov underwent testing just two weeks before the launch. The testing allowed state officials to identify and fix problems before it was open to the masses.

2) Simplicity

Kynect’s interface design is not impressive, nor was it meant to be. Sometimes, state officials recognized, simplicity is a good thing. The clean design of the site makes navigation easier. Information is provided at a sixth-grade reading level, so that those with a lower education level can understand their options. The pared-down site also makes loading faster for those without broadband Internet access – something that is often missing in Kentucky’s rural areas.

3)  Putting aside politics

Governor Beshear is a Democrat and a loyal proponent of the Affordable Care Act. Kentuckians, many deeply conservative and Obama opponents, have been skeptical of health care reform for a long time. The government shutdown and endless finger-pointing from lawmakers made the exchange more about politics than health care. But, weeks after the launch, Beshear made efforts to depolarize Kentucky’s exchange: “My message to Kentuckians is simply this, you don’t have to like the president; you don’t have to like me. Because this isn’t about him, and it’s not about me. It’s about you, your family and your children. So do yourself a favor. Find what you can get for yourself. You’re going to like what you find.”

Kynect.gov continues to impress on a national level. President Obama has vowed to fix the problems plaguing the federal exchange portal, but the bad press has already put a damper on its possible eventual success. It seems the real winners are the uninsured Kentuckians who are now signed up for health care, perhaps for the first time in their lives – getting lucky in Kentucky, indeed.

© 2014 by McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, PLLC. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Molly Nicol Lewis, McBrayer Law Firm, Health Care Attorney
Associate

Molly Nicol Lewis is an Associate of McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, PLLC. She practices in the firm's Lexington office, where she is a member of the Health Care Law section.

859-554-4414

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.