May 24, 2012

ICANN Continues March Toward Generic Top Level Domains

In what has been an on-going saga, development, and steady march, the Board of Directors of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (“ICANN”) recently reiterated its support for its proposed new generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) registration system. In related developments the ICANN Board also approved additional Internet domain names using Chinese script, and voted to allow the controversial .XXX top-level domain (“TLD”). The ICANN Board of Directors also announced it will use its September 24-25, 2010 retreat for consideration of all the outstanding issues relating to the implementation of the new gTLD program following one more public comment period on the Draft Application Guidebook. To brand owners without an Internet strategy or plan for new domain names, ICANN's actions should signify that new gTLDs are a matter of timing, i.e., not if, but when.

Internationalized Domain Names

During the 38th ICANN International Public Meeting held in Brussels, Belgium on June 20-25, 2010, ICANN approved, under its current policy, applications for five country-code top-level domains (“ccTLDs”) using Chinese character sets by three separate organizations, namely the China Internet Network Information Center (“xn--fiqz9s” and “xn--fiqs8s”), the Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation Limited (“xn--j6w193g”), and the Taiwan Network Information Center (“xn--kpry57d” and “xn--kprw13d”). This expansion of TLDs is intended as “a significant change for Chinese language users,” according to Rod Beckstrom, President and CEO of ICANN, and to increase the potential online accessibility for roughly a billion people who use Chinese script.1

Earlier this year, Egypt, the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates received approval by ICANN to use their non-Latin language scripts in the top-level domain part of an Internet address name, allowing for the first time for an entire Internet address name to be written in non-Latin characters, specifically Arabic and Cyrillic.2

.XXX Community Site

In a controversy going back to 2004, ICM Registry, Inc. previously filed an application for the .XXX sponsored Top-Level Domain (“sTLD”) as a potential community site for the adult entertainment industry. The application previously had been denied by ICANN and subsequently had an independent review by a three-member panel, supported by documentary evidence and witness testimony. During the 37th ICANN International Public Meeting held in Nairobi, Kenya on March 7-12, 2010, the ICANN Board of Directors agreed to create a process to reconsider the proposed controversial .XXX sTLD.

Following six years and over 13,700 comments since the original application, the ICANN Board of Directors voted in June to allow the application to move forward.

New gTLDs

Currently, there are 21 active gTLDs (e.g., .COM, .NET, and .ORG) and over 250 ccTLDs (e.g., .US, .FR, .CA, and .UK) that identify Internet space just as zip codes and country codes identify real space. ICANN's proposed new gTLD registration system is an effort to expand the list of active gTLDs. New gTLDs could include brand-specific domain extensions such as .MYCOMPANYNAME, geographic-centric domain names such as .TEXAS, and even generic domain extensions such as .SOFTWARE.

Although the new gTLD registration system has met resistance from brand owners over insufficient trademark protections, ICANN has been resolute in moving forward, while revising its Draft Application Guidebook to incorporate some trademark protections. The current Draft Application Guidebook Version 4 includes, for example, improvements for a Trademark Clearinghouse and Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) system.

The Trademark Clearinghouse will provide a single database of authenticated trademarks that can be used for pre-launch intellectual property Claims Services across multiple gTLDs. Pre-launch Claim Services may include, for example: (1) a “Trademark Watch” service to provide notice to trademark owners of any new domain name registrations matching their trademarks and notice to registrants that matching trademark registrations exist; or (2) a “Sunrise Period” during which trademark owners could register domain names matching their trademarks recorded with the Trademark Clearinghouse prior to general registration of domain names on a new gTLD.

The proposed URS system will provide an inexpensive and expedited procedure for addressing clear cases of trademark infringement by domain name registrants, resulting in a suspension, but not transfer, of the domain name. For a transfer of an infringing domain name, a brand owner must still pursue the standard Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (“UDRP”).

Importantly for brand owners, these limited trademark protections require registered (or court-validated) trademarks, so brand owners are advised to secure all unregistered trademarks expeditiously. Under ICANN's current proposal, moreover, brand owners will have the additional burden of proactively submitting their trademarks to the Trademark Clearinghouse, once it is formed, in order to receive its protections.

Additional public comments may be submitted regarding the trademark protections or the new gTLD program, on or before July 21, 2010, at http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/comments-4-en.htm.

These public comments will be summarized and analyzed by ICANN staff for presentation to the ICANN Board of Directors. In Brussels, the ICANN Board of Directors further announced it will use its September 24-25, 2010 retreat for consideration of all the outstanding issues relating to the implementation of the new gTLD program.4 Although there is no date certain for the launch of new gTLDs, ICANN's progress and resolve suggest that new gTLDs are only a matter of timing, i.e., not if, but when.

Not Just For Registries

Although companies that act as registries and also social media companies have unsurprisingly expressed interest in new gTLDs, at least one major brand owner has announced it will begin the acquisition process for the top-level domain name for its major brand. In March, Canon Inc. fired the first shot in domain name revolution, announcing its efforts to focus online communications using the .CANON domain name.4

For brand owners without an Internet strategy or a plan for new domain names, in light of ICANN's recent announcements, Canon's announcement could be considered a shot heard 'round the World Wide Web. Once again, brand owners should prepare accordingly as the march toward gTLDs continues and soon becomes a reality.

____________________

1 ICANN Approves Chinese Internationalized Domain Names (June 25, 2010) available by clicking here. (Last visited July 7, 2010)

2 ICANN Gives Final Approval for Four Countries to Use Non-Latin Languages in Internet Address Names (April 22, 2010) available by clicking here. (Last visited July 7, 2010)

3 See http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-25jun10-en.htm (Last visited July 7, 2010)

4 Canon to begin acquisition of the ".canon" Top-Level Domain name (March 16, 2010), available by clicking here. (Last visited July 7, 2010)

© 2012 Bracewell & Giuliani LLP

About the Author

Partner

Jeffrey Whittle has experience representing clients in various technology-based transactions, including licenses, agreements for technology development, transfer, acquisition, joint development, collaboration, product development, strategic alliance, collaboration, and product distribution, as well as various other intellectual property agreements in the software, telecommunications, mechanical/electrical, e-commerce, financial, energy and medical industries.

Mr. Whittle also has experience representing clients in various patent, trademark,...

713-221-1185
Associate

Jay Yates counsels clients in all aspects of intellectual property law, including patents, trademarks, copyrights and related matters.

Mr. Yates was general counsel for State Senator Dan Patrick. During law school, Mr. Yates worked as a legislative aide for State Representative Joe Crabb, as a committee clerk for the Texas House Committee on Redistricting, and as a law clerk for the Texas Attorney General Office of Special Investigations.

Prior to law school, Mr. Yates worked as an engineer and...

713-221-1375

Contributors

Associate

LaTasha Snipes counsels clients in all aspects of intellectual property law, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and related matters.

Prior to entering the legal profession, Ms. Snipes worked as an engineer, designing control strategies for oil and gas refineries. She also worked as a communication engineer in the aerospace industry.

During law school, Ms. Snipes was involved in mock trial where her team advanced to the national tournament. She also was the submissions editor of the Houston Business...

713-221-1495

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.