April 15, 2014

ICC Banking Commission Passes URDG 758

At its Fall Meeting in Brussels, at the National Bank of Belgium, the International Chamber of Commerce Commission on Banking Technique and Practice voted to approve a new revision of the Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees (ICC Publication 758). The revision is the product of more than two years of drafting and preparations.

Intended to reflect international standard practice in the use of demand guarantees, the Rules were first developed in 1991 and have not been revised since. They had gained acceptance more recently, however, as the World Bank incorporated the Rules into its guarantee forms and the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law endorsed them.

The revision is an attempt to make the Rules clearer, more precise, and more comprehensive, and is the product of consensus among bankers, users, and other members of the guarantee community. The Rules' articles have been renumbered into a more logical sequence, and the guarantor's independent role is stated more clearly in documentary terms. The relationships between the guarantor and customer or the applicant and beneficiary have been more clearly separated and defined. The Rules share some similarities with the ICC's work in letters of credit, particularly the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (UCP 600). The Rules will be accompanied by a set of model guarantee and counter-guarantee forms.

URDG 758 will be implemented July 1, 2010, but those who routinely are beneficiaries of or apply for demand guarantees should familiarize themselves with the Rules now, as the revision is significant in most areas. Please visit the ICC Bookstore to obtain a set of the Rules (available in March 2010).

© 2013 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author


Jacob A. Manning is a member of the Litigation Department. Jacob maintains a diverse litigation practice, and represents a wide variety of parties in civil litigation in state and federal courts in West Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. He has successfully represented clients before appellate courts in each jurisdiction.

In particular, Jacob focuses a significant portion of his practice on construction law and represents owners—particularly public entities—contractors, subcontractors, and material suppliers in litigation as well as during contract negotiations. Jacob...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.