Advertisement

May 24, 2013

ICD-10 Delay – HHS Proposes Extending Compliance Date for ICD-10 to October 1, 2014

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently announced a proposed rule that would delay the compliance date for the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition diagnosis and procedure codes (ICD-10) from October 1, 2013, to October  1, 2014.

Why the Delay?

According to HHS, three issues led it to propose the one-year delay:

1. The industry’s transition to Version 5010 (HHS’s infrastructure system for electronic claims) did not proceed as efficiently as expected, and HHS is concerned that the delays in implementing Version 5010 will negatively impact ICD-10 timelines. The industry’s successful transition to Version 5010 is a necessary precursor to ICD-10 adoption. Unfortunately, as the January 1, 2012, Version 5010 compliance date approached, a number of unexpected implementation problems emerged. In a move designed to provide the healthcare industry with sufficient time to complete its testing and software installation activities for Version 5010, HHS delayed theenforcement date for Version 5010 compliance to June 30, 2012.

2. Providers expressed concern that other statutory initiatives are stretching their resources. “Since the publication of the ICD-10 and Modifications final rules, a number of other statutory initiatives were enacted, [thus] requiring health care provider compliance and reporting. Providers are concerned about their ability to expend limited resources to implement and participate in . . . initiatives that all have similar compliance timeframes,” according to the proposed rule. In addition to ICD-10, providers are tackling the requirements of the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentives Programs and the eRx Incentive Program, along with the additional Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act requirements imposed by the Affordable Care Act.

3. Surveys and polls indicated a lack of readiness for the ICD-10 transition. HHS stated that “it is crucial that all segments of the health care industry transition to ICD-10 at the same time because the failure of any one industry segment to successfully implement ICD-10 has the potential to affect all other industry segments. Ultimately, such failure could result in returned claims and provider payment delays that disrupt provider operations and negatively impact patient access to care.” It became evident to HHS in early 2012 that certain sections of the industry would not be prepared for the 2013 compliance date. Based on ICD-10 readiness surveys conducted by the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services, it is estimated that 12–26 percent of providers will not be ready for the October 1, 2013, compliance date.

What this Means to Providers?

It is important to note that this is a proposed rule, and it is subject to regulatory review. After the rule is published on April 17, 2012, a 30-day  comment period begins. Following the comment period, HHS will review all comments and will draft responses to be incorporated into the final rule. There is no reason to think that the proposed rule will not be finalized; however, we caution providers against diverting all resources away from ICD-10 implementation. Providers should stay the course and use the extra time to finalize impact analyses, conduct testing, and deal with unanticipated challenges.

©2013 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved

About the Author

Partner

Jennifer Breuer is a partner and the vice chair of the firm’s Health Care Practice Group. She is also a co-chair of the firm’s Women’s Committee and member of its Practice Management Committee. Her practice includes the general representation of health care providers including hospitals, long-term care facilities, multi-specialty physician groups and ancillary service providers, as well as the special representation of pharmaceutical companies and device manufacturers in fraud and abuse and privacy compliance matters. Jennifer focuses on hospital-...

(312) 569-1256

About the Author

Associate

Rachel Ryan is an associate in the firm’s Health Care Practice Group. Rachel counsels health care systems, hospitals, physicians and physician practices on a wide range of regulatory, compliance and transactional matters.

Rachel advises clients on state and federal health care laws, including the Stark Law, Anti-kickback Statute, Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Rachel’s experience includes preparing and negotiating employment

(518) 862-7475

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.