May 24, 2012

If I could tell you one thing . . . It would be that you should always return your clients’ phone calls in a timely manner!

Phone Black & White

 

As an appellate attorney, I am asked to step into an existing case.  That means the client has had at least one, or possibly more, attorneys assisting them before a need for an appellate attorney even existed.   My primary interest – whether I represent the appellant or respondent/appellee - is if there is judicial error that justifies challenging the judgment below.   When the client comes to my office, I cannot simply blurt out, “Well, tell me why you think the court committed judicial error.”  Life doesn’t work that way, and as in any relationship, you have to start by building rapport and trust.

That means not only do I hear about what happened at the trial below, but how the attorney handled the case.  That includes how the attorney treated the client.  If the client has won the case, then the attorney may be viewed as a saint or a reincarnation of Perry Mason.  The client is flush with victory and seldom has a bad word to say about his or her attorney.

The situation is quite different if the client has lost.  The client is upset and confused, and is searching for a reason why he or she lost the case.  It couldn’t possibly be because the jury didn’t like their facts – or maybe didn’t even like them – so there must be another reason.  Was the judge on the take?  Some suggest that as a reason.  More often than not, the client will focus on the attorney.  And sometimes, they have good reason to do so.

The client’s number one complaint – as reported by bar associations - is that the attorney simply ignored them.  Didn’t write, didn’t call.  Nada.  And that sets the stage for the rest of their complaints.  After all, how can an attorney prepare for trial if he or she doesn’t have contact with the star witness (aka the client)?  And what about those times the client called with crucial information, only to be ignored by the attorney.  A small mistake, that could have been forgivable if made by a trusted attorney, becomes the source of malcontent.

So, if you want to maximize your chances of success and achieving client satisfaction, build client trust and rapport, then return those phone calls.  Or have your secretary do it.  Or drop an e-mail.  Without clients, we would be sitting around, playing “Battleship” on our computers.  Treating the client as though he or she is truly important by promptly returning phone calls is a small investment that will ultimately reap rewards in client satisfaction.  And clients – happy or disgruntled – will talk to their friends about their experience with you and the justice system.

© 2012 Donna Bader

About the Author

Donna Bader is a Certified Specialist in Appellate Law in Laguna Beach, California. For over thirty years, she has specialized in handling civil writs and appeals, and has written more than 350 appellate briefs. Donna is the former editor in chief of several legal publications, including Plaintiff, The Advocate, The Forum, and The Gavel. She is the author of Rutter’s Civil Litigation Guide, California Summary Judgment and Related Termination Motions. Donna is also a frequent lecturer and contributing writer for various legal...

949-494-7455

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.