Advertisement

May 25, 2013

Illegal Immigration Status Is Not Protected By Title VII

On May 21, 2012, the Seventh Circuit issued a decision in Cortezano v. Salin Bank & Trust Co., No. 11-1631, holding that an individual’s immigration status, by itself, was insufficient to support a national origin discrimination claim under Title VII.

The case involved a bank manager whose spouse had come into the United States illegally from Mexico.  The spouse used a tax identification number (which he obtained under what the court described as murky circumstances) to open joint accounts with at the bank.  After the bank manager revealed that her spouse was unauthorized, the bank became concerned about whether the joint accounts were fraudulent and commenced an investigation.  The bank manager subsequently walked away from her job after the bank refused to let her attorney attend a meeting during the investigation.  The bank manager then sued under Title VII, claiming that her termination was the result of national origin discrimination because her spouse was an unauthorized alien. 

The bank manager lost summary judgment at the trial court level and the Seventh affirmed.  The Seventh ruled that the bank’s actions were motivated by the fact that the spouse was an unauthorized alien - not because of his national origin.  The court did not regard a person’s immigration status as coming within the ambit of statutorily protected national origin discrimination. 

© 2013 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Partner

Hannesson Murphy is a partner in Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Indianapolis, Indiana office and a member of the firm’s Labor and Employment Law Department. 

317-231-7210

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.