May 24, 2012

Immigration Issues that Educational Institutions Must Address

All U.S. employers, whether the employer is the restaurant on the corner or a school district, must comply with the Immigration and Reform and Control Act ("IRCA") of 1986. IRCA requires all U.S. employers to complete an I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) form within the first three days of employment in order to verify the identity and work authorization of all workers, including U.S. citizens, that the employer has hired after November 6, 1986.

The law enables U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") to levy penalties in the thousands of dollars for each worker that it determines that the employer knowingly hired without authorization. The definition of "knowingly" is broad and expanding. It can include "constructive knowledge." ICE often alleges that constructive knowledge may be inferred when the employer fails to properly complete the I-9 form or spots warning signs on the form that indicate the worker may be presenting false documents. It also may exist when the employer receives a "no match" letter from the U.S. Social Security Administration ("SSA") and fails to investigate further. A "no match" letter, which may be issued by either SSA or, in some cases, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"), provides the employer with information that the government records relating to the employee's name and Social Security Number do not match (in the case of SSA) or name and work authorization do no match (in the case of DHS). Further, some employers, such as those who hold certain types of federal contracts, may need to complete the I-9 process in concert with using an E-Verify system that provides employers with an additional tool to identify new hires who may be presenting false documents during the I-9 process. Even where the employer has not knowingly employed any undocumented workers, the U.S. government can fine the employer between $110 and $1,100 per worker for "paperwork violations" which can include failing to complete an I-9 form or completing the form in a defective fashion. Such penalties can add up swiftly in large organizations.

For many years, the U.S. government did not aggressively enforce IRCA and the related I-9 process. September 11th changed the dynamic in dramatic fashion. ICE and kindred U.S. government agencies are actively auditing U.S. employers and, where they discover undocumented workers, they are often raiding the employers. The ICE website adds information about new raids almost every week. One notable development over the past year is that ICE is increasingly arresting managers at U.S. organizations in connection with these raids and charging them with crimes relating to knowingly hiring unauthorized workers and/or harboring them. ICE is even applying asset forfeiture provisions to both the organizations and the managers in some cases. ICE obviously views this approach as a way to deter organizations that do not take IRCA seriously and which turn a blind eye to the presence of undocumented workers. In many cases, the undocumented workers use the stolen identities of U.S. citizens to secure fraudulent documents and present them to the employer during the I-9 intake process.

Educational institutions are not without tools to ensure that they do not become the subject of tomorrow's press release. Instituting sound I-9 verification procedures as part of one's hiring process and conducting annual self-audits can help ensure that your organization is compliant. Dinsmore & Shohl offers one or two-hour I-9 training (led by a former attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice) and materials for an organization's staff that deals with the hire process. We also offer additional support such as guidance on how to conduct your own self-audit, and, as needed, technical support when I-9 questions arise during or after hire, such as when you receive a "no match letter" or tip that a worker on your staff may be undocumented.

Educational institutions also may tap into an attorney with immigration experience when they wish to hire a foreign national workers. Our team has decades of experience in handling a wide variety of employer-sponsored work visa (and permanent residence) cases, including but not limited to H-1B and O-1 visa cases.

Finally, school districts increasingly encounter children who wish to enroll in the schools of the district whose unlawful immigration status and/or that of their parents is in question. In addition to counseling districts on the legal or constitutional issues involved in educating these children, our immigration practice group can provide guidance and support on what action the district must take to investigate the immigration compliance issues that oftentimes arise in these scenarios. We also can help you to sponsor foreign students and exchange visitors who wish to attend your institutions.

Hence, immigration issues are more pervasive than one may think in the world of education. If you have a need for support in this area, please feel free to contact your attorney.
 

© 2012 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

David Lampe is a Partner in the Labor and Employment Law Department and Education Law Practice Group. David has extensive experience counseling public boards of education on a variety of education law issues, with an emphasis on labor negotiations, employment matters, civil litigation and workers' compensation. In addition to his legal practice, David is a frequent presenter at various law school forums across the State of Ohio.
 

513-977-8234

About the Author

Partner

Douglas Halpert understands the stress that immigrants and the organizations and family members that sponsor them have about navigating the complex U.S. immigration system. He has spent over two decades guiding a diverse array of clients, ranging from large publicly-traded multinational companies to non-profit organizations to a broad spectrum of professors, researchers, professionals and families, through the immigration maze. Foreign nationals with a pressing, time-sensitive need for help through the immigration process, such as engineers of every specialty, master cheese makers, film...

513-977-8181

Contributors

Associate

Brandon James is a member of the Corporate Department where he focuses his practice on general corporate law with an emphasis on mergers and acquisitions. Brandon is also a member of the Education Law Practice Group where he focuses on a variety of education law issues, including but not limited to, labor negotiations, employment matters, worker's compensation, contract drafting and bond issuances.

(513) 977-8606

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.