May 24, 2012

Implementation Of CISADA: New FAR Requirements

Effective September 29, 2010, the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (“FAR Councils”) issued an interim rule amending the FAR to implement sections of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 (“CISADA”), signed into law on July 1, 2010. 75 Fed. Reg. 60254 (Sept. 29, 2010). 

Certification

Section 102 of CISADA requires that offerors for a government contract certify that neither the offeror, nor any person owned or controlled by the offeror, engages in activity for which sanctions may be imposed under section 5 of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996, as amended. The sanctionable activity includes:
 

  • Investment in Iran’s petroleum production: Knowingly making an investment of $20 million or more (including by increments of at least $5 million within twelve months) that directly and significantly contributes to the enhancement of Iran’s ability to develop petroleum resources is prohibited.
     
  • Expansion of Iran’s refined petroleum industry: Knowingly selling, leasing or providing to Iran goods, services, technology, information or support, that could facilitate the maintenance or expansion of Iran’s domestic production of refined petroleum products, is prohibited. The restrictions apply to any individual transaction of at least $1 million or a total of $5 million over twelve months.
     
  • Exporting refined petroleum products to Iran: Knowingly selling or providing to Iran refined petroleum products with a fair market value of $1,000,000 or more in a single transaction, or $5 million or more during a twelve-month period, is prohibited.
     
  • Assisting Iran’s ability to acquire or develop weapons: Exporting, transferring, or otherwise providing to Iran any goods, services, technology or other items, knowing that it could contribute materially to the ability of Iran to acquire or develop chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons, or related technologies or acquire or develop destabilizing number and types of advanced conventional weapons.
     
  • Assisting Iran’s ability to import refined petroleum products: Knowingly selling, leasing, or providing to Iran goods, services, technology, information, or support, that could enhance Iran’s ability to import refined petroleum products, worth at least $1 million in a single transaction, or $5 million or more during a twelve-month period, is prohibited. CISADA specifically includes the following activities as indicia of supporting Iran’s ability to import refined petroleum products:
    • Providing certain insurance or reinsurance, underwriting, financing, or brokering for the sale, lease, or provision of such items, or
       
    • Providing ships or shipping services to deliver refined petroleum products to Iran.

Section 5 of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 recently was amended by CISADA; for a full description of the sanctionable activity please refer to our July and August articles. 

This certification requirement applies to all contracts, including commercial contracts, contracts for the acquisition of commercial-of-the-shelf items, and contracts below the simplified acquisition threshold. The certification will be part of the Online Representations and Certifications Application (“ORCA”). The lone exception to the certification is for procurements subject to the Trade Agreements Act (“TAA”). Offerors providing TAA compliant products from an eligible foreign country are not required to make this CISADA certification, an exception that obviously relieves foreign competitors of yet another burden laid on U.S. businesses.

The President may waive the certification requirement on a case-by-case basis if the President determines that it is in the national interest to do so and provides a written certification of the waiver to the appropriate congressional committees.

Apart from the customary False Claims Act liabilities that may accompany a false certification, penalties for submitting a false certification may include one or more of the following: 

  • The contracting officer may terminate the contract;
     
  • The contractor may be suspended in accordance with the procedures in FAR subpart 9.4; and/or
     
  • The contractor may be debarred for a period not to exceed 3 years in accordance with the procedures in FAR subpart 9.4. 

Procurement Prohibition

Section 106 of CISADA prohibits contracting with persons that export certain sensitive technology to Iran. “Sensitive technology” includes any hardware, software, or other equipment, that restricts the free flow of information in Iran or which monitors, disrupts, or restricts free speech in Iran. Persons determined to be exporters of certain sensitive technology will be listed on the Excluded Parties List. Agencies may not enter into or extend contracts with such persons. This section of CISADA is subject to further implementation in FAR Case 2010-018.

Comments on this interim rule are due by November 29, 2010.

Copyright © 2012, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

Associate

Ms. Madon is an associate in the Government Contracts and Regulated Industries Practice Group in the Firm's Washington, D.C. office.

202-469-4919

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.