May 24, 2012

Improper Earned Income Tax credit "EITC" Payments Top $11 Billion

 

A quarter of earned income tax credit payments are improper, amounting to $11 billion to $13 billion in 2009, the Internal Revenue Service reports.

The program is a refundable federal income tax credit for low to moderate income families and individuals. According to the GAO, the earned income tax credit program ranks second among federal programs in improper payments. According to the inspector general at the Treasury Department, the IRS has not made enough progress in preventing wrongful payments.

The IRS did not have quantifiable targets for reducing the payments, which management attributed to the need to balance tax enforcement among taxpayers at all income levels, and not solely focus on lower-income taxpayers.

The IRS said its new regulations for tax preparers will reduce the number of incorrect payments, but the inspector general warned that the effects of the new regulations are still unknown. The tax preparer regulations just began, and are not expected to be fully implemented until 2014. By that time, the IRS could issue $55 billion to $65 billion in improper payments from the earned income tax credit program the IG said.

FAST FACT: In 2009, 24 million taxpayers received $55 billion in earned income tax credit.

Following are other new watchdog reports released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), various federal Offices of Inspector General (OIG), and other government entities.

FINANCE

  • The international tax system used by the federal government taxes U.S. firms worldwide, while granting foreign tax credits to alleviate double taxation. Some scholars suggest applying the same tax burden on both foreign and domestic investments, while others suggest taxing foreign investment more to encourage domestic investment. There is some debate on how to improve the current system, with globalization demanding changes in international taxation. (Congressional Research Service)
  • The Department of Homeland Security made progress in its security systems, but management oversight issues remain. There are concerns with the Coast Guard Intelligence System and the information system for intelligence personnel. (Inspector General DHS)
Reprinted by Permission © 2012, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Laurel Adams graduated cum laude from the University of Delaware in May of 2010 with majors in international relations, Spanish, and Latin American studies. She interned at Voices Without Borders in Wilmington, Del., and the British Embassy in Washington, D.C. While at the University of Delaware, Adams studied abroad in Argentina, helped start a Spanish conversation club, and served as an editor for the Sigma Iota Rho Journal of International Relations.

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.