Advertisement

May 23, 2013

Insurer to Purchase Vertically Integrated Medicare Advantage Plan/Provider

WellPoint, one of the nation’s largest health insurers, has agreed to buy CareMore for approximately $800 million. WellPoint, which holds the license for Blue Cross in California and for Blue Cross Blue Shield in several other states, is the largest American health insurer in terms of patients covered, with one in nine Americans receiving coverage for their medical care through WellPoint’s affiliated plans. CareMore, based in Downey, California, is a physician owned medical group operating Medicare Advantage plans in California, Arizona and Nevada with the majority of its membership in California.

CareMore’s business model is focused on seniors and it has developed its own delivery system to complement its health plans. With a tight incorporation of employed physicians and other practitioners, 26 self-sufficient care centers clinics and well developed delivery systems, CareMore is considered one of the more vertically integrated Medicare Advantage systems in the country. With the acquisition WellPoint brings a management team on-board with significant and successful experience developing and growing Medicare Advantage business (the CEO of CareMore is one of the co-founders of PacifiCare) and also acquires a delivery system and physician network to significantly expand its MediCare Advantage business. The deal is scheduled to close by the end of 2011 and is subject to certain state and federal regulatory approvals and standard closing conditions. 

It will be interesting to see how this transaction is viewed by WellPoint. In some ways this may signal the beginning of a new merger and acquisition push by MediCare Advantage plans seeking to vertically integrate with physicians in light of potential changes in the reimbursement system stemming from healthcare reform. WellPoint may also see this acquisition as focused primarily on the core Medicare Advantage plans owned by CareMore with the care clinics and physician relationships viewed as secondary assets. Given the major push for integration between plans and medical groups we are witnessing in California, the former is more likely than the later

In fact, in a Wall Street Journal article published on June 9, 2011, WellPoint’s chief financial officer Wayne S. DeVeydt was quoted as saying that the acquisition was not “simply buying membership” but rather a long-term strategy to integrate physicians and clinics with WellPoint’s established plans. DeVeydt was quoted as stating that WellPoint planned to more than double CareMore’s existing clinics over the next 2 to 3 years, including expansion in New York where WellPoint has two existing plans in place.

Copyright © 2013, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

Partner

Eric Klein leads the national health care practice, and is a partner in the Century City office, of Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, a full service AmLaw 100 law firm with offices throughout California, New York, Washington, D.C. and Shanghai.  With over twenty-three years of practical legal and business experience, his practice focuses on the healthcare and related industries.  Known in the business community for his creative solutions and deal-making ability, Eric uses deep industry knowledge, entrepreneurial solutions, sophisticated negotiation skills and effective...

310-228-3728

About the Author

Associate

Aytan Dahukey is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm's Century City Office and is a member of the firm's Corporate Healthcare Practice Group.

310-228-3729

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.