May 24, 2012

IRS Extends Year-End Deadline for Pension Plan Amendments Under Code Section 436

The Internal Revenue Service recently extended the deadline for defined benefit plan sponsors to adopt amendments to comply with Section 436 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code).  Code Section 436 was added by the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) and contains limitations on benefit payments and accruals for defined benefit plans that do not meet the funding targets required by the PPA.

Notice 2011-96, issued November 29, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) extended the deadline for defined benefit plan sponsors to adopt amendments to comply with Section 436 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code).  Code Section 436 was added by the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) and contains limitations on benefit payments and accruals for defined benefit plans that do not meet the funding targets required by the PPA.

Prior to this new guidance, the amendment deadline for a defined benefit plan to comply with Code Section 436 was December 31, 2011, for a calendar-year plan.   Notice 2011-96 further extends the deadline to the latest of the following: 

  1. The last day of the first plan year that begins on or after January 1, 2012 (December 31, 2012, for calendar-year plans)
  2. The last day of the plan year for which Code Section 436 is first effective for the plan
  3. The due date, including extensions, of the employer’s tax return for the tax year that contains the first day of the plan year for which Code Section 436 is first effective for the plan.

Notice 2011-96 also extends the relief period under the anti-cutback requirements of Code Section 411(d)(6), which generally provide that a defined benefit plan does not satisfy tax exemption requirements if a plan amendment decreases a participant’s accrued benefit.

Although most calendar-year defined benefit plans will have a new Code Section 436 amendment deadline of December 31, 2012, some plan sponsors will be subject to an earlier adoption deadline if the plan sponsor submits a determination letter application on or after February 1, 2012, but prior to the plan’s amendment deadline under Notice 2011-96.   In particular, an accelerated amendment deadline may affect defined benefit plans that file determination letter applications during Cycle B (February1, 2012, to January 31, 2013).

Notice 2011-96 also provides defined benefit plan sponsors the long-awaited sample amendment that defined benefit plans can use to adopt amendments that satisfy Code Section 436 requirements.  A defined benefit plan’s adoption of the sample amendment within the required deadline will be deemed to comply with Code Section 436 and with the anti-cutback rules of Code Section 411(d)(6). 

The sample amendment has three parts.  The first part of the sample amendment contains limits on benefit payments and accruals for defined benefit plans that have not met the PPA funding targets. The first part also echoes the requirements under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, to notify participants when Code Section 436 limitations apply.  The second part of the sample amendment contains provisions that apply to multiple employer plans under Code Section 413.  The third part of the sample amendment contains optional provisions on the timing and form of distributions available to participants during a period when the Code Section 436 limitations apply and on participant elections of a new benefit form after Code Section 436 limitations cease to apply.  The third part also contains an optional provision for a plan sponsor to automatically restore benefit accruals when the restrictions under Code Section 436 cease to apply. 

Defined benefit plan sponsors should review the new guidance to determine the proper deadline for Code Section 436 amendments for their plans and to determine which of the optional provisions in the sample amendment to adopt.  For more information on this guidance or to discuss the new sample amendment, please contact your regular McDermott attorney or one of the listed authors. 

© 2012 McDermott Will & Emery

About the Author

Partner

Diane M. Morgenthaler is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office.  Diane has designed and amended various types of retirement plans for private and public companies and for taxable and tax-exempt employers, including a master and prototype plan for an insurance industry client and various pension profit sharing, 401(k), cash balance, pension equity, age-weighted, money purchase and employee stock ownership plans.  Her practice also includes counseling and drafting supplemental executive retirement plans.

...
312-984-7676

About the Author

Partner

Natalie Nathanson is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office.  Natalie focuses her practice primarily on designing, amending and administering pension plans, profit sharing plans, 401(k) plans, cafeteria plans, welfare benefit plans and nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements.  She counsels privately and publicly-held corporations and tax-exempt entities regarding fiduciary issues under ERISA, employee benefits issues involved in corporate transactions, and executive compensation matters. ...

312-984-6922

Contributors

Counsel

Maureen O'Brien is counsel in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office.  She focuses her practice on advising clients on a broad range of employee benefits matters, including qualified plan design, welfare plan design, employee benefit plan compliance issues, fiduciary matters, multiemployer pension plan issues and nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

312-984-3242

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.