May 24, 2012

IRS Gets More Tools to Crack Down On Overseas Tax Cheats

Rich Americans may soon find it more difficult to stash cash in the Cayman Island or Swiss bank accounts to avoid paying taxes. A new law gives the Internal Revenue Service the authority to create a computer system that can match reported foreign assets against income data sent to the IRS by foreign governments, a report by the Government Accountability Office says.

A law signed by President Barack Obama in March requires taxpayers with over $50,000 in foreign assets to file a disclosure statement with the IRS.

Under old rules, only taxpayers with foreign bank accounts worth more than $10,000 had to file a Report of Foreign Banks and Financial Accounts, or FBAR for short, and that information was not permitted to be verified against tax returns due to privacy concerns. But the disclosure statement created by the new law does not have that restriction, the GAO said.

“This change will allow the IRS to use its full complement of tools to verify the information or lack of information filed,” the GAO report said. “This authority should allow the IRS to develop a matching system where it can verify the [disclosure statement] data against the Automatic Exchange Information Program data to identify undisclosed accounts or assets.” Under the Automatic Exchange Information Program, foreign countries with U.S. tax treaties send income earned in that country by an individual with a U.S. address to the IRS.

However, since both the new disclosure statement and the FBAR filings are self-reported, the IRS still lacks “an established method to estimate the potential population of required filers,” the GAO noted.

From 2004 to 2009, the IRS increased FBAR examinations, a tool to combat white-collar crime, by 96 percent while penalties collected annually grew from $1.8 million to $9.8 million.

FAST FACT: Due to the attempted misuse of the IRS during the Watergate scandal, government reforms in 1976 restricted access to tax return information and made it harder for the IRS to enforce FBAR compliance.

Following are other new watchdog reports released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), various federal Offices of Inspector General (OIG), and other government entities.

NATIONAL SECURITY

  • The Pentagon is not maintaining an inventory of all its public web sites as required by law, and some 791 web sites identified as publicly accessible were either password-protected or didn’t exist. (OIG)

ENVIRONMENT

  • Improving the capture of natural gas produced on federal lands could boost royalty payments to the government by about $23 million annually and cut greenhouse gas emissions by about 16.5 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, the annual equivalent of exhaust from about 3.1 million cars. (GAO)
  • Oil shale deposits in Colorado and Utah could produce 3 trillion barrels of oil and generate significant government revenue, but questions remain regarding how to extract the oil, the amount of water needed, and the burden placed on local water sources. (GAO)
Reprinted by Permission © 2012, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Laurel Adams graduated cum laude from the University of Delaware in May of 2010 with majors in international relations, Spanish, and Latin American studies. She interned at Voices Without Borders in Wilmington, Del., and the British Embassy in Washington, D.C. While at the University of Delaware, Adams studied abroad in Argentina, helped start a Spanish conversation club, and served as an editor for the Sigma Iota Rho Journal of International Relations.

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.