Advertisement

June 19, 2013

IRS Provides Safe Harbor for Allocating Success-Based Fees

The release by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on April 8, 2011 of Revenue Procedure 2011-29 provides a welcome new safe harbor for taxpayers with respect to the deductibility of “success-based fees” paid in connection with business acquisitions and reorganizations.  “Success-based fees” are generally fees paid to investment bankers and other consultants that are contingent upon the closing of a transaction.  The new safe harbor allows a taxpayer to claim a current deduction for 70 percent of the success-based fees incurred in connection with a covered transaction, while requiring the taxpayer to capitalize the remaining 30 percent.

Under existing Treasury regulations, the portion of a success-based fee that is compensation for “facilitating” a transaction must be capitalized.  For example, amounts paid in the process of investigating or otherwise pursuing a transaction generally are deemed to “facilitate” a transaction. Only the portion of a success-based fee that is attributable to activities that did not facilitate the transaction can be deducted currently as an expense.  Moreover, the regulations presume that, success-based fees are presumed to facilitate the transaction.  The burden is on the taxpayer to rebut this presumption by providing sufficient documentation to the contrary.

With the release of Revenue Procedure 2011-29, the IRS hopes to reduce the large number of disagreements between the IRS and taxpayers about the type and extent of the documentation needed to prove that success-based fees are deductible.  For taxpayers opting for the safe harbor, the need to make a factual showing (and hence to establish and maintain documentation) is eliminated.

Revenue Procedure 2011-29 states that the IRS will not challenge a taxpayer’s allocation of a success-based fee between activities that facilitate a transaction (which must be capitalized) and activities that do not facilitate a transaction (which may be deducted) if the taxpayer:

  • treats 70 percent of the amount of the success-based fee as an amount that does notfacilitate the transaction;

  • capitalizes the remaining 30 percent as an amount that does facilitate the transaction; and

  • attaches a statement to its original federal income tax return for the taxable year the success-based fee is paid or incurred, stating that the taxpayer is electing the safe harbor, indentifying the transaction, and stating the portions of the success-based fees that are deducted and capitalized.

The new Revenue Procedure is effective for success-based fees paid or incurred in taxable years ending on or after April 8, 2011.  The election under Revenue Procedure 2011-29 is made on a transaction-by-transaction basis and is irrevocable once made.  Use of the election in connection with a transaction does not constitute a change in method of accounting for success-based fees generally, and therefore an Internal Revenue Code §481(a) adjustment is neither permitted nor required.

© 2013 McDermott Will & Emery

About the Author

Partner

Thomas W. Giegerich is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s New York office.  He is a member of the Firm's Tax Department and the head of the tax practice in the New York office.

212-547-5335

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.