Advertisement

May 23, 2013

JOBS Act Reduces Capital Raising Burdens

Endeavoring to stimulate the economy, Congress passed, and on April 5, 2012, the President signed, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”). This law will have a significant effect on the rules governing capital-raising and securities registration for many companies. Key provisions of the JOBS Act include: the removal of certain marketing restrictions for private funds, a provision authorizing crowdsource business funding in relatively small amounts, and other provisions generally intended to facilitate capital-raising for businesses. Another significant piece of the JOBS Act increases the allowable number of shareholders that many companies, including banks and bank holding companies, are permitted to have before registration is required.

The important provisions of the JOBS Act increasing the shareholder threshold for securities registration serve to amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934’s (the “Exchange Act”) registration requirements. Previously, most companies that had more than $10 million in assets and had more than 500 equity-holders (as defined under securities laws) were required to register under the Exchange Act. The JOBS Act amends the Exchange Act so that most private companies will be permitted up to 2,000 equity-holders before registration under the Exchange Act is required (unless more than 499 of the equity-holders are not accredited investors). These provisions apply to most private issuers, including, but not limited to, banks and bank holding companies.

The JOBS Act also amends the Exchange Act’s de-registration threshold, but these provisions are only applicable to banks and bank holding companies. When these provisions take effect, banks and bank holding companies who are already registered under the Exchange Act may de-register if the number of equity-holders of the bank or bank holding company falls below 1,200 equity-holders.

The JOBS Act also amends the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) to allow for crowdsource funding, or crowdfunding. The crowdfunding exemption contained in the JOBS Act is intended to allow companies to raise limited amounts of funding in small amounts from individual investors without triggering Securities Act registration requirements. This provision provides an exemption from the Securities Act registration requirements for transactions in which an issuer offers or sells their own securities. To rely on this exemption certain conditions must be satisfied. The issuer, for instance, must not have sold an aggregate amount of securities greater than $1,000,000 during the twelve-month period preceding the date of the exempt transaction. Also, attendant to the crowdfunding exemption are strict limitations on the amount of money an issuer can receive from any one investor. Additionally, any transaction relying on the crowdfunding exemption must be conducted through a broker or a funding portal (funding portals are certain outlets that will be established to comply with the terms of the crowdfunding exemption).

Another provision of the JOBS Act will serve to benefit companies that qualify as an emerging growth company. To qualify as an emerging growth company, the issuer must have had their initial public offering of common equity securities after December 8, 2011 and the company must have had less than $1 billion of total annual gross revenues during its last completed fiscal year. The JOBS Act relaxes many of the registration requirements for emerging growth companies, thereby making it simpler and less expensive for these companies to go public.

A number of other provisions in the JOBS Act affect how businesses can raise money. Most of the provisions of the JOBS Act will not be effective until they are implemented by SEC Rules. The implementing rules could substantially affect the legal significance of a number of the JOBS Act’s provisions. Thus, the import and effect of the JOBS Act is not yet clear. We will, as always, stay apprised of all of these developments and will continue to determine which avenues are optimal for our clients to raise capital. 

© 2013 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Mike Dailey combines his extensive legal experience with strategic business sense in order to help his clients navigate the many complex legal and business issues that challenge their organizations. Mike counsels clients within the public, private, and non-profit sectors in a variety of industries including banking, healthcare, manufacturing, consumer products, and various service industries. His corporate practice focuses primarily in the areas of mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance, capital raising (debt and equity), and bank regulatory compliance. He advises boards of directors...

513-977-8644

About the Author

Associate

Russell helps businesses accomplish transactions and solve problems. Russell works with companies on acquisitions, mergers, financing, organizing denovo institutions, regulatory oversight (by federal, state, and/or local authorities), and general corporate counseling. Russell goes above and beyond to help businesses efficiently navigate the complexities involved in transactions and governmental oversight. He recently led a merger of two notable local entities and helped them undertake a significant construction project. Russell previously served in The White House as a member of the...

(513) 977-8368

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.