May 24, 2012

Judge upholds civil money penalties assessed by US Labor Department to Progressive Protein in Omaha, Neb., for child labor violations

17-year-old employee killed at meat rendering plant in 2009

OMAHA, Neb. — U.S. Department of Labor Chief Administrative Law Judge Stephen L. Purcell has upheld civil money penalties of $100,000 assessed by the U.S. Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division against Progressive Protein LLC of Omaha, Neb., after a 17-year-old worker was killed in May 2009 at the company's Omaha meat rendering plant. The minor was operating a forklift and working at the plant in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act's child labor provisions.

This was the first hearing conducted in the nation regarding the Wage and Hour Division's Child Labor Enhanced Penalty Program, as established under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, which allows the Labor Department to assess greater penalties in cases involving violations of child labor provisions that cause the death or serious injury of a minor.

"We are gratified that the department's use of the tools established under the Genetic Information and Nondiscrimination Act was upheld," said Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis. "The Department of Labor is committed to enforcing America's child labor laws to protect this vulnerable group from workplace harm, and this decision will help us further that mission."

The Labor Department issued penalties to Progressive Protein in February 2010 following its investigation into the minor's death, which occurred when the forklift he was operating overturned. Progressive Protein did not verify the age of the worker prior to employing him even though the investigation determined the company was aware that he was a high school student. The company contested the department's findings and requested a hearing before an administrative law judge.

Progressive Protein also was cited in August 2009 by the Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration for four violations carrying proposed penalties of $8,500, following an inspection that was conducted as a result of the fatality. The violations included insufficient training for and inadequate supervision of powered industrial truck operators-in-training, the lack of seat belt use, deficient energy control procedures and improper record keeping.

The FLSA establishes a minimum age of 18 for those nonagricultural occupations that the secretary of labor finds and declares to be particularly hazardous for 16- and 17-year-old workers, or detrimental to their health or well-being. The company was cited for violations of Hazardous Occupations Order No. 7, allowing a minor to operate a power-driven hoisting apparatus, as well as Hazardous Occupations Order No. 10, permitting a minor to work in or about a meat rendering facility.

To learn more about the FLSA's requirements, call the Wage and Hour Division's toll-free hotline at 866-4US-WAGE (487-9243). Information also is available on the Internet at http://www.dol.gov/whd/.

© Copyright 2012 U.S. Department of Labor

About the Author

Our Mission is to foster, promote, and develop the welfare of the wage earners, job seekers, and retirees of the United States; improve working conditions; advance opportunities for profitable employment; and assure work-related benefits and rights.

866-487-2365

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.