May 24, 2012

Kaiser Settles FCA Case for $1.8 Million for Hospice Billing Errors

Kaiser Permanente recently settled a False Claims Act (FCA) liability for over $1.83 million following self-disclosure of hospice billing errors. As reported in a November 12, 2009, press release issued by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Oregon, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals - Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest and Northwest Permanente P.C., Physicians & Surgeons (collectively referred to as “Kaiser”) agreed to the settlement after self-disclosing that Kaiser submitted some claims for services provided by Kaiser Northwest Region Hospice between October 2000 and March 2004 without first obtaining an initial written certification of terminal illness from the individual beneficiary’s attending physician and hospice medical director.

Federal regulations require hospices to obtain a written certification of terminal illness within two calendar days of the start of the benefit period; in the event a written certification cannot be obtained within two calendar days, you must obtain a verbal certification. In the case of the initial certification period, the written or verbal certification must be from the hospice’s medical director or physician member of the interdisciplinary group and the individual’s attending physician, if the beneficiary has an attending physician. For subsequent certification periods, the certification must be from the hospice medical director or physician member of the interdisciplinary group. In no event should hospices submit claims to Medicare before a written certification is received and signed by the appropriate physician(s). Otherwise, they run the risk of submitting improper claims, which may trigger FCA liability.

To help avoid such FCA liability within your hospice, you should review your policies and procedures regarding certification and recertification of terminal illness, ensure that you have effective certification tracking systems in place so that no claims are submitted prior to obtaining written certifications and re-certifications, and, in the event you discover billing errors through internal audits, discuss the implications of self-disclosure with your attorney prior to self-disclosing such errors.

© 2012 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Of Counsel

Mike is a health care attorney advising clients on a variety of regulatory, contractual and operational issues in hospice, home care, and long-term care settings. In addition, Mike is an experienced health care consultant in regulatory, reimbursement, development and operational matters.

Prior Legal Experience

Mike's career began as a staff nurse at North Carolina Memorial Hospital in Chapel Hill.  He then went on to be the Hospital Supervisor of Raleigh Community Hospital.  After receiving his JD, Mike held consulting positions, had his own private practice...

919-783-2968

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.