Advertisement

June 16, 2013

Keeping Your Trademarks From Becoming XXX-Rated

A new top-level domain name, “.xxx”, will soon join the ranks of .com, .net, .org and other domain name extensions on the Internet. Following the recent approval by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (“ICANN”), .xxx has been authorized for the adult entertainment industry. Some trademark owners are understandably concerned that their marks may be used with the .xxx extension in a manner that would confuse the public or tarnish their marks. 

Trademark owners will have an opportunity to apply to preemptively block their trademarks from the .xxx registry during a 30 day “sunrise” period, that will run from September 7, 2011 to October 7, 2011. Owners of a registered trademark or service mark, or their authorized licensees or assignees, may apply to block the registration of the subject mark as a domain name. The application process contemplates that only domain names exactly corresponding to the text of a registered mark may be blocked. Accordingly, during the sunrise period, applicants will not have an opportunity to block alterations (for example, if another term, symbol or letter is added to or deleted from a mark) or misspellings. The cost to apply for domain-name blocking is expected to be between $200 and $300 (without further annual fees). More details regarding the launch of the .xxx registry and applications for domain name blocking are available at these sites: http://icmregistry.com/launch.php and http://icmregistry.com/registrars.php.

In the event that a trademark owner does not block its trademarks from registration in the .xxx registry, or if variations of its trademarks are registered in the registry, there will be an opportunity to challenge such registration and use, including by means of arbitration under ICANN’s Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (“UDRP”), or by litigation.

For many trademark owners, the decision of whether to apply to have their trademarks blocked from the .xxx registry will ultimately depend upon whether they conclude that the cost for prevention is less than the cost to effect a cure.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

jeffrey h. brown, partner, trademark law, michael best law firm
Partner

Jeffrey Brown is a partner in the firm’s intellectual property practice group who offers extensive experience counseling clients on a wide variety of business and intellectual property matters. His practice includes trademark, copyright, trade secret, advertising and unfair competition issues. He assists clients in developing strategies to protect, exploit and enforce their intellectual property rights and represents them against allegations of infringement. He has substantial experience representing clients in contested proceedings, including before the Trademark Trial and Appeal...

312-222-5794

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.