Advertisement

May 21, 2013

Lack Of Incentives Continues To Discourage Film Production In Nevada

A new story in the Las Vegas Review Journal talks about the continued lack of filming incentives in Nevada, an issue about which I have written previously.  As discussed in the story, Nevada continues to lose dollars to neighboring states as companies opt to film in places where economic incentives make a significant difference to overall production costs.  What kills me about this is that we are losing the opportunity to host t.v. shows and films that actually take place in Nevada, which opt to film in New Mexico or other states that provide substantial production incentives.  For example, a new CBS television show "Vegas," which takes place in (you guessed it) Las Vegas, is being filmed in Las Vegas -- the one in New Mexico.   

To give you a sense of the net economic impact that is being lost to other states, total television and film revenue in Nevada was $102.5 million in 2011, compared with New Mexico's reported $276.7 million in direct spending in 2011 due to film and t.v. productions.  And the state continues to experience what has been called a "steady decline" in filming revenue that has been trending downward for the last 10 years.

Until the legislature understands the value that film and television production can bring to our state and create incentives for filming here, I'm afraid we will continue to miss opportunities and lose dollars to our neighbors.  And that will mean fewer jobs for skilled crew members here in Nevada. 

© Copyright 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP. All rights reserved

About the Author

Partner

Matt Kreutzer serves as Chair of the firm's Franchise, Distribution and Antitrust practice group and is a Certified Specialist in Franchise and Distribution Law by the California State Bar's Board of Legal Specialization. He has spent more than a decade working with individuals and companies on issues relating to franchise law and is well-versed in all stages of the franchise relationship. 

702-678-5070

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.