Advertisement

June 19, 2013

Late Notice: Not the One-Way Street You Might Expect

In the April 2006 issue of the Litigation & Counseling Alert, we explained some of the ways in which policyholders may lose coverage for otherwise covered claims by failing to satisfy the various notice requirements in their insurance policies, and how to avoid those situations.

What should a policyholder do, however, when an insurance company denies a claim, asserting, for example, that an exclusion in the policy precludes coverage for the loss? Upon review of the policy, if it appears that the exclusion clearly applies to the claim at issue, is the insured completely out of luck? Not necessarily, because insurance companies have notice requirements, too.

Insurance Company Obligations

Insurance is regulated at the state level. Therefore, every state has its own set of statutes, typically referred to as the “Insurance Code.” These laws set forth what insurance companies must do in order to sell their products to consumers in the state. By complying with these requirements, insurance companies strengthen their ability to enforce the terms and conditions of their policies.

In the insurance business, policies, endorsements, declaration pages and notices to policyholders are collectively referred to as “forms.” In most states, insurance companies must obtain approval of their forms, typically by filing them with the state’s insurance department or commissioner. Some states also require that if the insurance company intends to replace a previously approved form, the new one must be submitted for approval. An insurance company that sells a form to the public without complying with these requirements is in violation of the particular state’s law, and therefore might not be allowed to deny coverage on the basis of that form.

Most states also require that insurance companies notify insureds of an intention not to renew a policy on the same terms as the expiring policy. For example, many states, including Illinois, require insurers to notify policyholders of their intent to:

  • Increase the premium by more than a certain percentage set in the statute
  • Increase the deductible by a substantial amount
  • Reduce coverage by introducing a new exclusion or expanding the scope of an existing one

In most cases, the insurer must provide this notice one or two months before the effective date of the change. If the insurance company fails to comply with a state’s “notice not to renew” requirement, state law may compel the insurer to extend the expiring policy for an additional period (which could be as long as a year) on the same terms and at the same price.

Although insurance companies do not often make these kinds of mistakes, they do happen. Thus, if your claim has been denied, even for a reason that appears to have a basis in the policy, you should consult with your broker or coverage attorney. These knowledgeable individuals can determine whether the insurance company failed to notify you, the state or both, which may result in coverage for your claim.

© 2010 Much Shelist Denenberg Ament & Rubenstein, P.C.

About the Author

Principal

Neil B. Posner, Chair of the firm's Policyholders' Insurance Coverage practice group, focuses his legal practice in the area of insurance coverage, with specific emphasis on insurance recovery and dispute resolution, risk management, loss prevention and cost containment. His clients include a range of public and private companies, organizations, boards of directors, individual officers and other policyholders.

312-521-2623

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.