Advertisement

May 21, 2013

Law Firm Marketing Resources Focus on Content Strategy

 

The best 10 minutes of the Law Firm Marketing Partner Forum happened to me at 5:00 PM after sitting through 8 hours of presentations. The last session, Social and Electronic Media 2011: How Firms are Using It Successfully, had just ended. Most session attendees had made a bee line out the door and off to the bar. I wandered toward the podium where the usual group of hangers-on were chatting up the presenters.

Earlier in the Forum, at a different session, one of the speakers, Silvia Coulter with Hildebrandt, had observed how social media was free.  No, I thought (and tweeted) social media is NOT free. Good content strategy requires substantial resources. Only the medium is free.

Now, at the podium was Alice Grey Harrison, from Dixon Hughes PLC, the largest CPA firm based in the Southern US. Alice had just described to us a recruiting effort based largely on a Twitter campaign. Her honest assessment: “I’m thanking God it worked out. It could have been a complete failure.” With Alice was Hans Haglund, from Paul Hastings. Hans had described a pilot social media listening campaign featuring one of the firm’s practice areas. My question to each of the panelists was simply how had each secured the human resources required to make their social media initiatives work. Their responses revealed the simple truths about the direction of marketing in general and social media marketing in particular.

Alice first noted that their firm’s marketing staff was growing. They had recently merged their company with Goodman & Company LLP. But she quickly added that they were not putting the emphasis on print media that they had. And they were migrating their marketing skill sets from people who could assemble brochures and other print collateral to those who could create online content. Bingo – content generation replaces print collateral.

Hans response was equally insightful. The case he presented was not about publishing but about mining  social media for actionable opportunity.  Hans had noted that their experiment had discovered that 1 of 10 social media conversations about their brand was actionable in some way.

Who, I asked Hans, was frittering away their time in social media environments to uncover this information? He responded that all the effort was done internally by a combination of analysts and their IT people.  He acknowledged the effort was resource intensive. If they determined the benefit was great enough, consideration would have to be given to growing head count or moving marketing staff activities from their emphasis on their traditional marketing.

If there was a theme to the discussions of law firms’ social media efforts throughout the Forum, it was one of measured experimentation. Nevertheless, the early returns suggest a consistent emphasis on publishing content strategically and, conversely, listening carefully to what is being published.

© 1999-2013 Duo Consulting

About the Author

Director of Internet Marketing Strategy

Sonny works closely with Duo’s clients to develop their online business and marketing strategy. His tactical responsiblities include: Implementing and managing paid search engine campaigns;  Consulting on and implementing permission-based email; Providing strategic online marketing consultation to law firms and others using web analytics to help drive website and business performance and Conceputalizing and implementing social media marketing

Sonny has over 30 years of business management and marketing experience,  He was a Serial entrepreneur...

312-529-3003

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.