Advertisement

May 18, 2013

Law & Order PEPU: California’s new Privacy Enforcement and Protection Unit

In a move signaling increased enforcement of the state’s data privacy and security regulations, California’s Attorney General Kamala D. Harris has announced the creation of the Privacy Enforcement and Protection Unit.   The Privacy Unit will be staffed by California Department of Justice Employees, including six dedicated prosecutors, and will have broad authority to enforce federal and state laws relating to the collection, retention, disclosure and destruction of private and sensitive information, including medical, financial and government records, by individuals and public and private organizations.  Effective immediately, a number of California Justice Department programs related to identity theft enforcement and education will be absorbed by the Privacy Unit, in an effort to centralize and streamline California’s data privacy protection efforts.    For California consumers, the creation of the Privacy Unit will likely result in easier access to education materials for protecting personal data.  For businesses and organizations collecting, storing, transmitting or processing personally identifiable information, the Privacy Unit is one of many warning signs that California intends to take the enforcement of data privacy regulations seriously.

The creation of the Privacy Unit is the latest in a series of initiatives by the California Attorney General’s office intended to address growing concerns about data privacy.  In August 2011, Attorney General Harris announced the creation of the eCrime Unit, a division responsible for “investigating and prosecuting large scale identity theft and technology crimes with actual losses in excess of $50,000.  Earlier this year, the six largest companies offering platforms for mobile applications agreed to a set of principles, authored and developed by the Attorney General’s office, designed to ensure that mobile applications sold on such platforms comply with California’s Online Privacy Protection Act.  Last month, that set of mobile application privacy principles was expanded significantly when Facebook elected to sign on as well.

With the Privacy Unit in place, actions enforcing California’s data privacy regulations, which are among the strictest in the nation, are certain to increase.  “The Privacy Unit,” according to Attorney General Harris, “will police the privacy practices of individuals and organizations to hold accountable those who misuse technology to invade the privacy of others.”  Based on prior comments from Harris, such enforcement may include prosecutions under California’s Unfair Competition Law  and/or False Advertising Law, which imposes penalties of up to $500,000.   As a result, if you operate a business or organization using or accessing the personally identifiable information of others, time may be running out to ensure that you comply with California’s quickly evolving requirements.

©1994-2013 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Jacob is an Associate in the firm's Corporate & Securities Section in the San Diego office.

Before joining Mintz Levin, Jacob served as a Judicial Extern for the Honorable William McCurine, Jr. of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of California, where he drafted reports and recommendations on habeas corpus petitions and social security appeals. Prior to that, he worked at the University of San Diego's Entrepreneurship Clinic as a Student Attorney, interviewing, screening, and assessing issues of potential clients, and researching issues regarding choice...

(858) 314-1584

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.