In December 2011 a local Michigan resident and the Sierra Club filed a court action against the Mascoma cellulosic ethanol plant (Frontier Renewable Resources) planned for Kinross Charter Township in Chippewa County. The multiple claims alleged that, since a $58.5 million federal grant is involved for the project that an environmental impact statement (EIS) was required under federal law. The suit acknowledged that an environmental assessment was performed, but challenged as erroneous the finding of “no significant impact.” Listing impacts on air quality, forest health, degradation of wildlife and fisheries habitat, and reduction of visual and recreational quality likely to result from projected harvest of 2,800 tons of hardwood logs per day, the suit sought to enjoin the Frontier project unless and until a complete EIS is prepared. The federal district judge recently dismissed the lawsuit, finding environmental and health issues had been adequately considered, that mitigation projects would adequately account for wetland impacts, and that no endangered species were involved. Meanwhile, everyone in Michigan is wondering when construction will begin.
© 2013 Varnum LLPLaw Suit Against U.P. Cellulosic Bio Refinery Dismissed
Boost: AJAX core statistics
- Primary menu
- Home
- Publish With Us
- Contributors
- About Us
- Contact Us
- Advertise
- Sign Up For NLR Bulletins
- QUICK LINKS
- Antitrust Law
- |
- Bankruptcy & Restructuring
- |
- Biotech & Cleantech
- |
- Business of Law
- |
- Election
- Construction & Real Estate
- |
- Environmental, Energy & Resources
- |
- Financial, Securities & Banking
- Health Care
- |
- Immigration
- |
- IP Law
- |
- Insurance
- |
- Labor & Employment
- |
- Litigation
- |
- Media & FCC
- |
- Tax
Related Articles
- New Jersey Court Clips Highlands Council’s Wings, Upholds Exemption
- D.C. Circuit Affirms Federal Energy Regulatory Committee Returns on Equity Policy But Reverses For Failure to Apply Administrative Procedure Act Official Notice Rule
- Fifth Circuit Flushes Away Pro Se Plaintiff’s Claims Against Oil Giants for Intellectual Property Theft and Infringement of a “Giant Plunger”
- Texas Federal Court Dismisses Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Contribution Claimed Based on Alleged “Re-Contamination” of Former Superfund Site
- New York Appellate Court Affirms Broad Right of Local Governments To Use Zoning to Ban Gas Drilling
- Texas is Among States Filing Petition for Cert with U.S. Supreme Court on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Rules
- Supreme Court Invites Solicitor General to File Brief Expressing United States Views on Texas-New Mexico Water Dispute
- Federal Appeals Court Reinstates EPA “Veto” Over Corps’ Mining-Related Permit
From This Author
Advertisement
Advertisement
Recent Contributions to the National Law Review
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Poyner Spruill LLP
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC
Beveridge & Diamond PC
McDermott Will & Emery
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Poyner Spruill LLP
von Briesen & Roper, S.C.
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Much Shelist, P.C.
Armstrong Teasdale
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Bracewell & Giuliani LLP






