Advertisement

May 18, 2013

Legislation Aims to Ease Capital Raising Burdens

While the current economic climate continues to challenge many emerging businesses, the stage appears set for an easing of regulatory burdens and limits on capital raising.

The President and Congress have expressed their intention to pass multiple federal securities laws amendments included in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups, or "JOBS," Act (H.R. 3606), which was recently passed by the House. If enacted, this bill could reduce capital raising costs for emerging businesses and provide more freedom to solicit investors.  Following is a brief summary of the JOBS Act provisions recently passed by the House (companion measures are currently being debated in the Senate):

Reopening American Capital Markets to Emerging Growth Companies Act

For companies that go public, this bill would reduce costs by phasing-in reporting requirements over five years or until the company has $1 billion in annual gross revenue.

The Access to Capital for Job Creators Act

This bill would eliminate longstanding prohibitions on the general solicitation of investors under SEC Regulation D and allow companies to engage in certain advertising efforts targeted toward investors.

The Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act ("Crowdfunding")

This bill would allow an emerging business to raise up to $1 million (or $2 million if audited financials are provided) from an unlimited number of investors without having to verify the investors' accredited investor status (commonly known as "crowdfunding"). In crowdfunded offerings relying upon this exemption, investments from any one investor during the previous 12-month period would be limited to the lower of $10,000 or 10 percent of the investor's annual income.

The Small Company Capital Formation Act

This bill would increase the maximum amount of capital that can be raised in an SEC Regulation A offering from $5 million to $50 million.  Regulation A offerings are scaled-back forms of registration with less disclosure and regulatory requirements than a full registered offering under the Securities Act of 1933.

The Private Company Flexibility and Growth Act

  • Would increase from 500 to 2,000 the threshold for the number of shareholders that trigger the requirement for a company to register with the SEC.  The bill also would increase the record shareholder registration threshold for banks and bank holding companies from 500 to 2,000.
  • Would allow more public companies to go private and would avoid certain onerous rules applicable to Exchange Act filers, such as Sarbanes-Oxley and various Dodd-Frank provisions

President Obama and the Congressional leaders from both parties have publicly expressed their support for the major policy provisions of the JOBS Act. With this bipartisan support, passage of the JOBS Act or a very similar set of reforms appears likely to occur before the election. We will provide further updates as the JOBS Act makes its way through Congress to the President's desk.

© 2013 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

At Barnes & Thornburg LLP, our corporate attorneys are dedicated to the single, yet encompassing, goal of helping our clients achieve their business objectives. We bring experience, efficiency, energy and creativity to the single-minded pursuit of this goal.

We offer advice and counseling on a wide range of legal issues facing business in the 21st century. Whether you are a Fortune 500 company, an emerging growth company, or a middle market company positioned in between, we are committed to providing prompt and proactive, value-added service, while placing at your disposal...

317-231-7803

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.