May 24, 2012

Legislative Update - Wisconsin Assembly Passes “Concealed Carry” Bill

On Tuesday, June 21, 2011, the Wisconsin State Assembly passed SB93, known as the “Concealed Carry” bill, and submitted the bill to Wisconsin’s Governor for his signature. If signed by the Governor, the bill allows licensed individuals to go armed with a concealed weapon. Individuals who (1) are 21 or older, (2) have cleared a background check, (3) are not otherwise prohibited from carrying a gun, and (4) complete a training program, are eligible to receive a license, which is valid for five years. In addition, individuals from other states may carry concealed weapons in Wisconsin as long as they have gone through training and a background check in their home state. All concealed carriers must have their license and photo identification with them while they are carrying a concealed weapon.

Taking effect immediately upon publication is certain immunity from a disorderly conduct charge. A licensee may not be charged with disorderly conduct for loading, carrying, or going armed with a firearm, so long as there is an absence of criminal or malicious intent.

Certain locations are restricted. The bill prohibits a licensee from carrying a concealed weapon in a police station, a jail, a secured mental health institution as defined by state law, a courthouse, and a place beyond the security checkpoint in an airport. However, the bill permits the presence of weapons in vehicles driven or parked at the above locations.

Concealed carry is permitted in certain other public buildings and in city and state parks, although governmental entities may opt to prohibit weapons from public buildings. If they choose to do so, they must post a sign alerting individuals to the prohibition.

The bill contains provisions for employers. Although an employer may prohibit an employee from carrying a concealed weapon during the course of the employee’s employment, the employer may not prohibit an employee from carrying a concealed weapon as a condition of employment. An employer that permits employees to carry a concealed weapon is immune from liability that might arise from that decision. In contrast, an employer that prohibits employees from carrying concealed weapons does not enjoy such immunity.

As with employers, private individuals who allow concealed carry on their property are immune from liability arising from that decision. Those wishing to prohibit concealed carry on their property, however, must post signs with such notification.

A spokesperson for the Governor has indicated that the Governor will release a timeframe within which he will sign the bill. Once the Governor signs the bill, the Secretary of State has 10 days to publish it. The bill will then take effect on the first day of the fourth month after the Secretary of State publishes it, meaning that the bill could become law on October 1, 2011 or on November 1, 2011, depending on the publication date.

©2012 von Briesen & Roper, s.c

About the Author

President and CEO of von Briesen & Roper, s.c.

Randall D. Crocker is President and CEO of von Briesen & Roper, s.c. where he chairs the firm’s Banking, Bankruptcy and Business Restructuring Practice Group. Randy’s practice is concentrated in the representation of business and institutions in matters of commercial finance, commercial transactions, commercial litigation, banking, business restructuring and bankruptcy. He represents banks, hospitals, manufacturers, service providers, municipalities, and other public, private, for profit and not-for-profit entities.

414-287-1238

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.