Advertisement

May 23, 2013

Long-Delayed Sunshine Rule One Step Closer to Release

Despite growing pressure from both consumer groups and industry groups, the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (the Act) final rule has not yet been published. However, the rule is one step closer to final release, as it is now in the hands of the Office of Management and Budget for review.

Requiring annual reporting of payments between applicable drug or device manufacturers and physicians or teaching hospitals, the Act is intended to shed light on these financial relationships. The Department of Health and Human Services will foster transparency for both consumers and the federal government by publishing this data on a public website and sending annual reports to Congress.

The delay of the highly anticipated final rule follows the delayed release of the proposed rule late last year, and the postponement of several other key Act implementation deadlines. Under the statute, data collection was to begin January 2012. However, due to the modified timeline, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced earlier this year that collection would not begin until January 2013. Applicable manufacturers must begin disclosing required physician payment data 90 days after the release of the final rule.

The final rule has been long-awaited by interested parties. Consumer groups have criticized the publication timeline for placing implementation of the Act over a year behind schedule. Drug and medical device groups likewise have criticized this delay, as they worry they will not have adequate time to prepare for what many view as the burdensome requirements under the Act.

More information on the Sunshine Rule is available via the Bloomberg BNA article below.

Bloomberg BNA – “Long-Awaited Final ‘Sunshine’ Rule Lands at OMB for Regulatory Review”

© 2013 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Staff Attorney

Nita Garg is a staff attorney in Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Chicago office and a member of the firm’s Health Care Department.

312-214-4847

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.