May 24, 2012

Luihn Food Systems Pays $277,000 To Resolve EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

Company Failed to Stop Abuse of Female Employees at Raleigh KFC, Agency Charged

RALEIGH, N.C. – Luihn Food Systems, Inc. will pay $277,000 and furnish other relief to resolve a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today.

According to the lawsuit, Tina Underwood, Sheila Mungin, Sabin Sheridan, Barbara Nowlin and a class of similarly situated female employees were sexually harassed between February 2007 and January 2008 while working at a Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant owned and operated by Luihn Food Systems in Raleigh, N.C. The harassment included unwelcome sexual touching by a male employee at the restaurant, including rubbing his body against the women, touching their buttocks and breasts and walking into the restroom while a female employee was using it. Despite receiving several complaints about the harassment, Luihn Food Systems failed to take action to stop it, the EEOC said.

Sexual harassment violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC originally filed suit in August 2009 in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina (Civil Action No. 5:09cv00387), after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process.

In addition to monetary damages, the two-year consent decree resolving the suit requires Luihn to revise its sexual harassment policy to include, among other things, procedures for reporting sexual harassment and procedures for the prompt investigation of employee complaints about it. Luihn will also post a copy of its sexual harassment policy at all of its facilities and conduct an annual training program for all employees on its policy and Title VII’s prohibition against sexual harassment.

“Once an employer is put on notice that any of its employees, male or female, are being subjected to sexual harassment, it must take prompt corrective action to stop it,” said Lynette A. Barnes, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Charlotte District, which includes the Raleigh Area Office, where the original charges of discrimination were filed. “We are pleased that, in resolving this case, Luihn is taking action to encourage the prompt reporting and investigation of sexual harassment complaints.”

Tina Burnside, supervisory trial attorney for the EEOC’s Charlotte District, added, “The EEOC is pleased that the consent decree includes injunctive measures designed to ensure that this kind of harassment does not happen again.”

The EEOC is responsible for enforcing federal laws prohibiting discrimination in employment. More information about the EEOC is available on its website atwww.eeoc.gov.

© Copyright 2012 - U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

About the Author

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because of the person's race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. It is also illegal to discriminate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.

Most employers with at least 15...

800-669-4000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.